The Down Range Forum

Member Section => Down Range Cafe => Topic started by: philw on February 12, 2010, 06:03:23 AM

Title: interesting numbers
Post by: philw on February 12, 2010, 06:03:23 AM
was talking with one of the blokes at work  re populations 

we looked up   how big is Australia to USA   and the size of cities


http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_cities_by_population
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_in_Australia_by_population

1   New York   New York   8,363,710
2   Los Angeles   California   3,833,995
3   Chicago   Illinois   2,853,114
4   Houston   Texas   2,242,193
5   Phoenix   Arizona   1,567,924
6   Philadelphia   Pennsylvania   1,447,395
7   San Antonio   Texas   1,351,305
8   Dallas   Texas   1,279,910
9   San Diego   California   1,279,329
10   San Jose   California   948,279

1   Sydney   New South Wales   4,399,722
2   Melbourne   Victoria   3,892,419
3   Brisbane   Queensland   1,945,639
4   Perth   Western Australia   1,602,559
5   Adelaide   South Australia   1,172,105
6   Gold Coast-Tweed   Queensland/New South Wales   558,888
7   Newcastle   New South Wales   531,191
8   Canberra-Queanbeyan   Australian Capital Territory/New South Wales   395,126
*   Canberra   Australian Capital Territory[3]   345,257
9   Wollongong   New South Wales   284,169
10   Sunshine Coast   Queensland   237,562
11   Greater Hobart   Tasmania   209,287




also   with how big  we are compared to Europe   
(http://www.vskc.org.au/uploads/exped/Australia%20and%20Europe%20compared.jpg)

yet  90%  or so  of our population  is around the City's 


interesting to look at though
Title: Re: interesting numbers
Post by: Solus on February 12, 2010, 09:24:33 AM
Similar to China.  I used to think China was a very large country but it turns out it has about the same area as the USA.

Like Australia, 90% of it's population is in the cities along the coast.

 
Title: Re: interesting numbers
Post by: WatchManUSA on February 12, 2010, 11:10:09 AM
I would guess that most countries have 80% to 90% of their populations living in cities/suburban areas.  I found some other interesting tid-bits concerning how the world's land mass is utilized.

Land Use Statistics - About 30 percent of the surface is exposed land and 70% is covered by water.  This land usage is broken out as follows:

Arable land: 13.13 percent (of the 30%)

Defined as: Land cultivated for crops like wheat, maize, and rice that are replanted after each harvest

Permanent crops: 4.71 percent (of the 30%)

Defined as: Land cultivated for crops like citrus, coffee, and rubber that are not replanted after each harvest; includes land under flowering shrubs, fruit trees, nut trees, and vines, but excludes land under trees grown for wood or timber.

Permanent pastures: 26 percent (of the 30%)

Forests and woodland: 32 percent (of the 30%)

Urban areas: 1.5 percent (of the 30%)

It is estimated that 12.5% of the Earth’s surface is suitable for humans to dwell.  The 1.5% above is a fraction of the fraction.  If my math is correct Urban Area's occupy just .05% of the total Earth's surface.   In reality, people occupy an insignificant percentage of the Earth's surface.

Other: 30 percent (of the 30%)
Title: Re: interesting numbers
Post by: ellis4538 on February 12, 2010, 02:27:51 PM
38-24-36

Those are interesting numbers!!!!!!LOL

JMHO

Richard
Title: Re: interesting numbers
Post by: Solus on February 12, 2010, 02:56:47 PM
I would guess that most countries have 80% to 90% of their populations living in cities/suburban areas.  I found some other interesting tid-bits concerning how the world's land mass is utilized.


Arable land: 13.13 percent (of the 30%)

Defined as: Land cultivated for crops like wheat, maize, and rice that are replanted after each harvest

Permanent crops: 4.71 percent (of the 30%)

Defined as: Land cultivated for crops like citrus, coffee, and rubber that are not replanted after each harvest; includes land under flowering shrubs, fruit trees, nut trees, and vines, but excludes land under trees grown for wood or timber.


It is estimated that 12.5% of the Earth’s surface is suitable for humans to dwell.  The 1.5% above is a fraction of the fraction.  If my math is correct Urban Area's occupy just .05% of the total Earth's surface.   In reality, people occupy an insignificant percentage of the Earth's surface.


Interesting that there is more land suitable for crops (13.13 + 4.71 = 17.30) than is suitable for human dwelling (12.5).  I guess no one would want to live in a rice paddy...but I wonder what other crops are like that?