The Down Range Forum

Member Section => Politics & RKBA => Topic started by: ericire12 on June 25, 2010, 09:45:47 AM

Title: The case against Kagan - In the Washington Slimes ?
Post by: ericire12 on June 25, 2010, 09:45:47 AM
Label me shocked  :o



http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jun/24/the-case-against-kagan/

Quote
We know she is remarkably lacking in courtroom experience.

We know she deliberately ignored the law while at Harvard, and unfairly besmirched our military in time of war.

We know she cut corners in order to preserve partial-birth abortions.

We know she is willing to undercut First Amendment free speech for political purposes.

We know Ms. Kagan is hostile to gun rights.

We know she believes foreign law is highly relevant to U.S. law.

We know she believes judges should automatically favor certain classes of people and impose their own values to reach desired outcomes.

And we know lots of other things about Ms. Kagan.
Title: Re: The case against Kagan - In the Washington Slimes ?
Post by: JC5123 on June 25, 2010, 12:30:34 PM
Label me shocked  :o



http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jun/24/the-case-against-kagan/


Shocked that BHO would choose a piece of ______ like this, or that the Washington Times actually printed something against her?
Title: Re: The case against Kagan - In the Washington Slimes ?
Post by: fightingquaker13 on June 25, 2010, 12:57:43 PM
Shocked that BHO would choose a piece of ______ like this, or that the Washington Times actually printed something against her?
Y'all realize the Washinton Times is a very conservative paper right? Its the Fox News of print. My only problems with it is that its about as "fair and balanced" as Fox but that's because its owned by the Moonys, not its ideology. Check out their opinion pages. Nary a liberal to be found (well rarely). Its also got good inside baseball coverage of the Hill and the Pentagon in weekly roundups. The think is, that it does have an agenda, that of the "Reverend" Moon, but he's as right wing as Murdoch.
FQ13
Title: Re: The case against Kagan - In the Washington Slimes ?
Post by: tt11758 on June 25, 2010, 04:55:53 PM
Y'all realize the Washinton Times is a very conservative paper right? Its the Fox News of print. My only problems with it is that its about as "fair and balanced" as Fox but that's because its owned by the Moonys, not its ideology. Check out their opinion pages. Nary a liberal to be found (well rarely). Its also got good inside baseball coverage of the Hill and the Pentagon in weekly roundups. The think is, that it does have an agenda, that of the "Reverend" Moon, but he's as right wing as Murdoch.
FQ13


You say that as though it were a BAD thing.  ;D
Title: Re: The case against Kagan - In the Washington Slimes ?
Post by: fightingquaker13 on June 25, 2010, 04:59:16 PM

You say that as though it were a BAD thing.  ;D
I'm not a fan of The Unification Church or the Reverend Moon
FQ13 Gay marriage, I don't much care about, mass arranged marriages where the couples (often underaged) have never met until their majic day in the stadium? Not so much.
Title: Re: The case against Kagan - In the Washington Slimes ?
Post by: tt11758 on June 25, 2010, 05:02:45 PM
I'm not a fan of The Unification Church or the Reverend Moon
FQ13 Gay marriage, I don't much care about, mass arranged marriages where the couples (often underaged) have never met until their majic day in the stadium? Not so much.

Nor am I.  However, ANY conservative voice in the media is a refreshing break from the status-quo.  Hell, I'm Catholic, but that doesn't mean I buy into ALL of their teachings.
Title: Re: The case against Kagan - In the Washington Slimes ?
Post by: tombogan03884 on June 26, 2010, 01:55:30 AM
FQ, I will over look dogmatic, and cultural differences to oppose the common enemy.
(can always liquidate their leaders  later, during their victory celebrations )
Their cooperation, along with the "Christian Science Monitor", with Mossad, helps offset the a holes in Foggy Bottom..