The Down Range Forum
Member Section => Tactical Rifle & Carbine => Topic started by: GUNS-R-US on July 01, 2010, 01:34:18 PM
-
http://www.military.com/news/article/corps-set-to-field-saw-replacement.html
Corps Set to Field SAW Replacement
July 01, 2010
Military.com|by Matthew Cox
The Marine Corps will field its new, lightweight auto rifle this fall to five combat battalions preparing for war-zone deployments.
Commandant Gen. James T. Conway gave Corps officials the green light in April to issue approximately 450 M27 Infantry Automatic Rifles, enough to replace every M249 squad automatic weapon in four infantry battalions and one light armored reconnaissance battalion.
The limited fielding is a final test to find out if the Heckler & Koch-made weapon performs as well in an operational environment as it has in testing, said Charles Clark III, who oversees infantry weapons requirements at the Corps' Combat Development and Integration office at Quantico, Va.
"The battlefield test will be a verification of what we have already established through extensive operational testing," Clark said. "We want to get a user assessment prior to full-rate production."
Conway's decision comes despite his past concerns about replacing the M249 with a magazine-fed automatic rifle. His main worry is whether the M27's light weight and accuracy will be enough to make up for the loss of suppressive firepower Marine gunners will give up when they go into battle without the belt-fed M249.
Program officials acknowledge that a 30-round magazine cannot produce the high volume of fire the M249 is capable of when loaded with a 200-round belt. The Corps is considering high-capacity magazines that can hold 50 or 100 rounds of 5.56mm ammo, but Marines that deploy with this first batch of IARs will carry only 30-round magazines.
"The initial limited fielding will not include a high-capacity ammunition source, but that remains an option," Clark said, explaining that such magazines will have to undergo a separate round of testing.
The M27, a variant of the H&K 416, weighs just 7.9 pounds, unloaded. By comparison, the M249 weighs 17 pounds, unloaded.
Marines involved in operational testing at Twentynine Palms, Calif.; Fort McCoy, Wis.; and Camp Shelby, Miss., were "very comfortable with it because it's a lot like a M16A4 and it's far more maneuverable and portable" than the M249, Clark said. "The H&K gun has performed very well throughout operational testing."
Marine officials selected the H&K weapon in October over two prototypes from Colt Defense LLC and one made by FN Herstal. (Colt makes the M4 and FN makes the M249.) The M27 uses a short-stroke gas piston, which proved more reliable than the M16/M4's direct gas system in an Army dust test in late 2007.
The new IAR, which fires from the closed-bolt position, is most effective when employed as a point-target weapon, program officials maintain.
"The accuracy has been a real standout," Clark said. "The IAR has demonstrated to be a far more accurate gun" than the M249, which fires from the open-bolt position.
In the defensive role, the M27 used "far less" ammunition to drop the same number of targets compared to the M249, Clark said.
Program officials maintain that the increased accuracy will compensate for the M27's slower, sustained rate of fire. Unlike the M249, the new IAR doesn't have a spare barrel that can be switched out to prevent overheating. Marine gunners will have to keep their sustained rate of fire at 65 rounds per minute compared to the M249's 85 rounds per minute.
"It has a little bit lower sustained rate of fire, but it's far more accurate," Clark said.
The Corps hopes to begin fielding the M27s in November so Marine units have "four to six months" to train with their new weapons.
"We are not sending these guns straight to Afghanistan," Clark said. "The units that are participating will have the guns long before they go into theater."
Each company in the three active infantry battalions and one reserve infantry battalion will receive 28 M27s, one for every SAW gunner and one extra to remain organic to the unit. These companies will also retain six M249s to give commanders more firepower if necessary, Clark said.
The LAR battalion will receive 14 M27s per company and will not retain any M249s.
The Corps plans on buying 4,476 M27s and reducing its number of M249s from 10,000 to approximately 8,000, Marine officials said.
But that adjustment will not happen until Conway sees the results from the user assessment, Clark said, adding that it could be late next summer before the feedback is collected from theater.
Marine Corps requirements officials hope that Conway will decide whether to take the weapon into full-rate production by late 2011.
"We are confident that the gun we have tested is a good gun, but the final decision rests with the commandant of the Marine Corps," Clark said.
Sounds like a good idea to me. 17lbs is an awful heavy gun to pack around to me. I spent one winter packing around a 12lb .308 for hunting cause it was the only rifle I had. That sucked! It's very hard for most folks (including me) to shoot something that heavy standing without support!
-
Sounds like apples and oranges.
Your replacing a light machinegun with an automatic rifle, like the full auto M-14 in 5.56.
Great for the guy who is carrying it, sucks for the guys who want the additional firepower so they can manuver.
-
I think the higher cap drum mags will fix that. If I were one of those Marines I would probably spend my own money to purchase one or two for the trip!
-
Hey! Think of all those cheap surplus SAWs we can buy.....oh, wait. :'( ;D
FQ13
-
Beta C mags have to kept very clean and lubricated with graphite to be reliable, and I would not take one into places where they have to be bumped, dropped, ran into barricades etc.., they should have made it belt fed, they did have belt fed HK G3's, model 51 I think, I bet this will evolve into one, 65 and 85 rpm in a machine gun??? MISPRINT, The 249 is 750-1,000 rpm, probably meant the M27 is 650 rpm, there is a 150rd mag by Armatac, weighs 8lbs loaded, supposedly good stuff but I don't know, does not make sense to me, cool assault rifle, crappy Squad automatic weapon replacement. IMHO, especially with a 30rd mag, maybe more reliable, but accuracy is doubtful better than an M4 using the same ammo, and I would bet the designated marksman M4's with 77 grain pills is superior.
-
4 column stagged magazines will get you around 50, I think.
-
The cyclic rate is 750 or whatever. The sustained rate of fire is what you can do constantly without overheating the barrel.
-
Frank, real hard to keep your cyclic rate at 65 or 85 rpm, on full auto, you could do it real easy on single action, but your trigger finger is going to get real tired. Your right, at the above mentioned rpm, the barrels ought to last a long, long time.
-
That was around the rate of fire put out by British troops at the beginning of WWI with Lee Enfields. ;D
-
i can almost do that in my m1 30-06 is a much bigger can of whoop ass then the 556
-
Sounds like they're going to adopt one of these in .223.... ::)
(http://world.guns.ru/machine/bar1918.jpg)
http://world.guns.ru/machine/bar1918.jpg (http://world.guns.ru/machine/bar1918.jpg)
-
If the primary concern is mostly to reduce wieght than why not test the Ares Defence Systems http://www.aresdefensesales.com/ (Strike 5.56)? It's a belt feed upper that will fit on any M4 and can still use 30 rd. mags, Beta-mags or the same 200 rd. SAW belts. It also has a quick change barrell system in 10",16" and 20". They may have already tested this and found it not to be up to par, but I would hate to think they didn't and our guys end up with a product that really don't fit their needs.
-
I don't think it will happen, I don't see Congress coming up with funds.
Promised or not. (F 35, new Helo's for Marine 1 )
-
This is insane. A mag-fed automatic rifle without a quick-change barrel is not a replacement for a SAW. How many times does the US military need to learn this lesson?
It's lighter to carry than the SAW. Great. But at some point you stop carrying and start shooting. A lot.
And the accuracy question? One of the few criticisms of the Bren gun of WWII was that it was TOO accurate:
"Initial versions of the weapon were sometimes considered too accurate because the cone or pattern of fire was extremely concentrated, resulting in multiple hits on one or two enemies, with other enemy soldiers going untouched. Soldiers often expressed a preference for worn-out barrels in order to spread the cone of fire among several targets. Later versions of the Bren addressed this issue by providing a wider cone of fire."
A machinegun needs to be a bit less accurate to create a larger "beaten zone" of suppressive fire. High volume of fire is more important than pinpoint accuracy - an open bolt design is your friend.
-
This is insane. A mag-fed automatic rifle without a quick-change barrel is not a replacement for a SAW. How many times does the US military need to learn this lesson?
It's lighter to carry than the SAW. Great. But at some point you stop carrying and start shooting. A lot.
And the accuracy question? One of the few criticisms of the Bren gun of WWII was that it was TOO accurate:
"Initial versions of the weapon were sometimes considered too accurate because the cone or pattern of fire was extremely concentrated, resulting in multiple hits on one or two enemies, with other enemy soldiers going untouched. Soldiers often expressed a preference for worn-out barrels in order to spread the cone of fire among several targets. Later versions of the Bren addressed this issue by providing a wider cone of fire."
A machinegun needs to be a bit less accurate to create a larger "beaten zone" of suppressive fire. High volume of fire is more important than pinpoint accuracy - an open bolt design is your friend.
Spoken like an older Machine gunner. ;D
In WWII and Korea machine guns were used to fire indirect harassing fire.
During WWI "raids" were conducted on German rear areas by massing large numbers of guns and firing indirect fire into a grid square, just like an artillery fire mission.
They don't actually teach the machine gun any more, and few Officers or Troops truly understand the weapon they have in hand.
-
Bad idea to make a dedicated Automatic Rife with a closed bolt. Get into a fire fight and you have a gun that is unsafe as it will cook off the round in the chamber. Only takes 6 mags on a M4A1 to get a cook off used in a suppressive fire mode. I know because I've done it.
CD
-
Bad idea to make a dedicated Automatic Rife with a closed bolt. Get into a fire fight and you have a gun that is unsafe as it will cook off the round in the chamber. Only takes 6 mags on a M4A1 to get a cook off used in a suppressive fire mode. I know because I've done it.
CD
Thanks you for the "reality" CD, I hope more "decision makers" actually LISTEN to those that do what you do, and provide the optimum platform.
P.S. What are you thoughts on the FN FAL? In general civilian usage?
Thanks again.
-
Love the FAL, have owned a FN49 in 7x57 and two FALs in the past. I used to hunt with my FNs during the 90s. My longest deer harvest was with a 18" SAR48 Bush Rifle wearing a 2.5x scope at 300m. Have found FALs buried in Kuwait between the wars and got them up and running. Have toted several battlefield pickups in Iraq during the years also (however never did use them in anger). I prefer a M14/M1A for long range (past 500m) work do to the better sights however as a general purpose, running around, balanced rifle that will function in all weather thats the FAL. Did get to handle an orginal H&R T48 (US test rifle against the M14 during development) in my units arms room in Germany in 88'.
CD