The Down Range Forum
Member Section => Down Range Cafe => Topic started by: Hazcat on July 14, 2010, 03:10:24 PM
-
No plan to file lawsuits for refusing to cooperate with feds
By Stephen Dinan and Kara Rowland
2:29 p.m., Wednesday, July 14, 2010
The Obama administration said this week that there is no reason to sue so-called sanctuary cities for refusing to cooperate with federal authorities, whereas Arizona's new immigration law was singled out because it "actively interferes" with enforcement.
"There is a big difference between a state or locality saying they are not going to use their resources to enforce a federal law, as so-called sanctuary cities have done, and a state passing its own immigration policy that actively interferes with federal law," Tracy Schmaler, a spokeswoman for Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., told The Washington Times. "That's what Arizona did in this case."
But the author of the 1996 federal law that requires states and localities to cooperate says the administration is misreading it, and says drawing a distinction between sanctuary cities and Arizona is "flimsy justification" for suing the state.
"For the Justice Department to suggest that they won't take action against those who passively violate the law --who fail to comply with the law -- is absurd," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee and chief author of the 1996 immigration law. "Will they ignore individuals who fail to pay taxes? Will they ignore banking laws that require disclosure of transactions over $10,000? Of course not."
Officials in Arizona say they've been unfairly singled out by President Obama and Mr. Holder, who last week sued to overturn Arizona's law, arguing it could lead to a patchwork of state laws.
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer said cities that refuse to cooperate with federal authorities on illegal immigration --commonly called sanctuary cities -- are just as guilty of creating a patchwork, and violate the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996.
And Mr. Smith said the administration doesn't appear to understand that law, which requires localities to share information on illegal immigrants with federal authorities.
"The White House is just plain wrong on the premise since the Arizona law mirrors federal law - it does not 'interfere' with it," he said.
The Arizona law, which goes into effect July 29 unless a court blocks it, requires authorities to inquire about the legal status of anyone they detain who they have reasonable suspicion might be in the country illegally. The law as amended specifically prohibits using race or ethnicity as a reason for suspicion.
Messages left with Mrs. Brewer's office Wednesday were not returned, but in her statement after the lawsuit was filed, she said Arizona was being targeted.
Story Continues at link →
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jul/14/justice-sanctuary-cities-are-no-arizona/
comments at link
-
Everyone needs to tell their elected Officials to support AZ and tell Obama and crew they are wrong.
-
Seems like it's okay to not enforce laws if non-enforcement will lead to the destruction of the US. But it's not okay to enforce laws that strengthen the US. Something is awfully wrong with those in charge. It's time for a throw-the-bums-out party, fireworks optional.
2012 cannot come soon enough. I hope the Republic lasts that long.
-
How the hell did we get to Bizarro World were everything is backwards?
-
How the hell did we get to Bizarro World were everything is backwards?
One word....Universities. >:(
-
So-o-o-o-o-o.
by extension, if a local LEO see a kidnapping in progress or a bank robbery, they should just walk on by because those are Federal crimes.
"Excuse me sir, hope your bank robbery is going okay. I am going to have to ticket you for double parking. Otherwise have a great day."
-
Sure Alf, why not? Seems selective enforcement is the new norm!
-
So-o-o-o-o-o.
by extension, if a local LEO see a kidnapping in progress or a bank robbery, they should just walk on by because those are Federal crimes.
"Excuse me sir, hope your bank robbery is going okay. I am going to have to ticket you for double parking. Otherwise have a great day."
Perhaps he should direct traffic so the speeding getaway car is less of a traffic hazzard.
-
Maybe Gov Brewer should declare AZ a "sanctuary state for Americans"!
-
Maybe Gov Brewer should declare AZ a "sanctuary state for Americans"!
I'd go.
When are people going to wake up and quit believing this stupid shit.
The truth is that the dumb asses who populate this country are not really worthy of our concern, they deserve Obummer and Pelosi.
-
How the hell did we get to Bizarro World were everything is backwards?
LAWYERS!!!!!!!
-
LAWYERS!!!!!!!
They were banned in at least one of the Colonies before the Union was formed, Mass, IIRC.
I guess it is a case of Lost Wisdom.
-
I think that the FEDs are mad because some Local LEOs are doing their job better than they ever did. Clean up America deport a lawyer.
-
They were banned in at least one of the Colonies before the Union was formed, Mass, IIRC.
I guess it is a case of Lost Wisdom.
I doubt it was Mass. John Adams was a Lawyer.
-
I doubt it was Mass. John Adams was a Lawyer.
I found this link. Much more information than I had before...was just aware lawyers were banned. Nice concept though.
http://www.caught.net/prose/everyam.htm
A similar concept was presented in the Heinlein novel The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress.