The Down Range Forum

Member Section => Politics & RKBA => Topic started by: Hazcat on February 20, 2008, 07:07:30 AM

Title: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: Hazcat on February 20, 2008, 07:07:30 AM
Second Amendment an individual right

The U.S. Supreme Court will soon decide D.C. v. Heller, the first case in more than 60 years in which the court will confront the meaning of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Although Heller is about the constitutionality of the D.C. handgun ban, the court's decision will have an impact far beyond the District ("Promises breached," Op-Ed, Thursday).

The court must decide in Heller whether the Second Amendment secures a right for individuals to keep and bear arms or merely grants states the power to arm their militias, the National Guard. This latter view is called the "collective rights" theory.

A collective rights decision by the court would violate the contract by which Montana entered into statehood, called the Compact With the United States and archived at Article I of the Montana Constitution. When Montana and the United States entered into this bilateral contract in 1889, the U.S. approved the right to bear arms in the Montana Constitution, guaranteeing the right of "any person" to bear arms, clearly an individual right.

There was no assertion in 1889 that the Second Amendment was susceptible to a collective rights interpretation, and the parties to the contract understood the Second Amendment to be consistent with the declared Montana constitutional right of "any person" to bear arms.

As a bedrock principle of law, a contract must be honored so as to give effect to the intent of the contracting parties. A collective rights decision by the court in Heller would invoke an era of unilaterally revisable contracts by violating the statehood contract between the United States and Montana, and many other states.

Numerous Montana lawmakers have concurred in a resolution raising this contract-violation issue. It's posted at progunleaders.org. The United States would do well to keep its contractual promise to the states that the Second Amendment secures an individual right now as it did upon execution of the statehood contract.


BRAD JOHNSON

Montana secretary of state

Helena, Mont.

More at link http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080219/EDITORIAL/646772049&template=nextpage

Now THAT is the kinda man I would be proud to have representing me!
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: Lucas on February 20, 2008, 03:20:37 PM
I was born and rasied in Montana, I love it here!!!  I will be perfectly honest when I say that I wasn't always a "good guy".  One of the things I love most about this state is that it is an extreme rarity that someone breaks into a house when they are home.  I atribute this to the fact that it is common knowlege that just about everyone here can and does own a firearm.  The only ones here afraid for their life are the bad guys.  Anyone I know would gladly risk their lives for a perfect stanger in need of help.  THIS IS THE WAY IT SHOULD BE!!!  Granted we are not the most populated state,  here our neighbors are our friends.  We look out for one another.  About two months ago around 3am 2 young males were trying to break into my mustang.  While I was sleeping like a log, my neighbor heard the noise,  came outside holding a single shot  12ga and they ran like hell.  There most likely wont be any arrests,  however I doubt they will be coming back this way anytime soon!  I guess what I am getting at is when it comes down to it there is no better feeling than knowing that the people around are willing and able to keep this place safe for all of us.
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: DDMac on February 20, 2008, 03:44:37 PM
I had the privelige of serving, long ago, with some sailors and Marines from Montana. They expected nothing without effort and were in high gear when Battle Stations sounded.

In the populous eastern US, where I now live (NC), it is clear to me that the citizens clamoring for free gubment cheese by far outnumber those willing to work for theirs. It doesn't seem to matter if the candidate has a pitchfork, horns and a pointy red tail, whichever one promises the most, for the least effort, will win.  Just Dammit!!

ps Looks like you've got it figured out now, Lucas.
  Mac.
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: Bidah on February 21, 2008, 04:57:13 AM
Yeah, you just gotta love this state.

There is more on it at http://www.progunleaders.org

-Bidah
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: clayflingythingy on February 21, 2008, 07:24:46 AM
That's all well and good, but 8 men and 1 woman will ultimately decide what the constitution says on this issue. And I am nervous as hell.
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: Lucas on February 22, 2008, 03:32:17 AM
Get what you can get while you can get it and let them try to take it!!!
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: jnevis on June 12, 2008, 01:21:52 PM
I was amazed to read about this.  I wonder if any other states are willing (or even looking at thier compact/constitutions) to make the same statement.  Montana's only problem is that they don't have the infrastructure or economy to legitimately void thier compact and leave the Union.  Now states like Florida, Texas, or Arizona on the other hand....
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: Hazcat on June 12, 2008, 01:23:51 PM
Florida?  With wish washy dem lite Crist?  NEVER happen!
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: ericire12 on June 12, 2008, 01:25:57 PM
Quote
A collective rights decision by the court would violate the contract by which Montana entered into statehood, called the Compact With the United States and archived at Article I of the Montana Constitution. When Montana and the United States entered into this bilateral contract in 1889, the U.S. approved the right to bear arms in the Montana Constitution, guaranteeing the right of "any person" to bear arms, clearly an individual right.

So, why did this not come up in the Supreme Court hearings....... sounds like pretty rock solid precedent to me.
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: Solus on June 12, 2008, 02:50:45 PM
You know, I've been thinking that if the Supreme Court rules in our favor this month, both on an Individual Right and Strict Interpretation, this will be the most meaningful and monumental 4th of July in my life....

I've been wondering where to have the party, and it now seems that Montna might be the place....and I'd buy those lawmakers a round of beer....

But, does anyone in Montana know how to make really good BBQ or Chili???

Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: DDMac on June 12, 2008, 04:37:56 PM
THAT, Sir, depends on where you're from? Red or vinegar based BBQ?
 Mac.
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: Lucas on June 12, 2008, 05:49:48 PM
Yes sir,  Montana answering that call!  Around my house we will have a pig in the pit,  bombs bursting in air,  and beer flowing from the tap!!!
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: Ron J on June 12, 2008, 05:56:39 PM
You know, I've been thinking that if the Supreme Court rules in our favor this month, both on an Individual Right and Strict Interpretation, this will be the most meaningful and monumental 4th of July in my life....

I've been wondering where to have the party, and it now seems that Montna might be the place....and I'd buy those lawmakers a round of beer....

But, does anyone in Montana know how to make really good BBQ or Chili???



YES! Can't speak to the pork BBQ but I can say I have had some of the best steaks and chili there ... of course, I make my own!  When I lived in Billings, therer was a restaurant there that had the best hot wings in the free world too.  Called the Rex.  GREAT place. 

As it looks, we are moving back to Billings once our house in Edmond, OK sells.  Can't wait. 
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: Solus on June 12, 2008, 08:18:58 PM
Mac,  I prefer vinegar BBQ sauce, but one of the best I've had was tomato based and from the Weber Charcoal Grill cookbook...

Ron,  Steak always works...no sauce...Wonder if the wings place, Rex takes reservations =)))

But, Lucas...now your place sounds great...a tap, huh??  =)))

And I don't suppose you folks in Montana wring your hands much about Global Warming???
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: Lucas on June 12, 2008, 10:04:38 PM
I wish the world would get a little warmer,  it snowed pretty good on Tuesday & Wednesday!
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: Hazcat on June 12, 2008, 10:11:25 PM
Snow?? What's that?  (http://www.clicksmilies.com/s1106/cool/cool-smiley-020.gif)
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: Lucas on June 12, 2008, 10:41:09 PM
Believe it!!!  I haven't worked for 3 days.  Its pretty much gone now but in three hours on tuesday everything was white,  and the mountains stayed like that until today!
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: tombogan03884 on June 13, 2008, 02:21:58 AM
I was amazed to read about this.  I wonder if any other states are willing (or even looking at thier compact/constitutions) to make the same statement.  Montana's only problem is that they don't have the infrastructure or economy to legitimately void thier compact and leave the Union.  Now states like Florida, Texas, or Arizona on the other hand....
None of the former Confederate States retained that sort of option in their post 1865 State Constitutions.
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: tombogan03884 on June 13, 2008, 02:28:11 AM
Believe it!!!  I haven't worked for 3 days.  Its pretty much gone now but in three hours on tuesday everything was white,  and the mountains stayed like that until today!

I talked to my Dad in Idaho on tuesday and after I got done complaining about 90+ and humid the previous 3 days he said it was still in the 40's and snow flurries. I laughed at him because his first winter out there I was complaining about COLD and snow, and He told me "Oh, We don't have that problem in Riggins canyon, never gets much below freezing"  HA
Title: Re: MONTANA STANDS TALL!!
Post by: kmitch200 on June 15, 2008, 01:15:39 AM
Quote
A collective rights decision by the court would violate the contract by which Montana entered into statehood, called the Compact With the United States and archived at Article I of the Montana Constitution.

Stories like this just make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside.  THANKS!