The Down Range Forum

Member Section => Down Range Cafe => Topic started by: LittleRed on February 15, 2011, 08:16:40 AM

Title: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: LittleRed on February 15, 2011, 08:16:40 AM: Cast your vote if you have a chance.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/opinion/todaysbuzz/tuesday/sfl-prohibit-extended-ammunition-clips-law-021411,0,4729252.story
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: Hazcat on February 15, 2011, 09:24:54 AM: VOTE!

It is 62% to 38% FOR banning!
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: billt on February 15, 2011, 09:52:35 AM: Isn't this an uber liberal paper? Bill T.
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: billt on February 15, 2011, 10:34:14 AM: It's now showing 51.3 % against, 48.7% for. It looks like they've stopped the voting. Typical libtards, trying to limit their ass kicking. Bill T.
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: TAB on February 15, 2011, 11:57:56 AM: online polls mean very little... the smiple fact that its been posted around on gun sites has already skewed the data well beyond tolerance.
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: MikeBjerum on February 15, 2011, 12:34:26 PM: It is now 62% against the ban and 38% for the ban.

However the bigger question is if the Cat will go open a can of whoop ass on the paper for trying to talk the talk when they don't know the language >:(
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: tombogan03884 on February 15, 2011, 12:34:27 PM: Not so TAB, You think it isn't being posted on "Anti" websites as well ?
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: TAB on February 15, 2011, 12:59:59 PM: the antis don't really have a web site(forums)

I put zero stock in online polls
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: MikeBjerum on February 15, 2011, 01:04:19 PM: Quote from: TAB on February 15, 2011, 12:59:59 PM
the antis don't really have a web site(forums)

I put zero stock in online polls

I call BS on this entire post!

They have their own systems of communication and activation just like we do. And polls like this may not be scientific, but they will be quoted and many will accept them as the final word on the will of the public.
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: billt on February 15, 2011, 01:10:09 PM: Quote from: m58 on February 15, 2011, 01:04:19 PM
And polls like this may not be scientific, but they will be quoted and many will accept them as the final word on the will of the public.

This in spite of the fact the anti's are multiple voting like crazy, and still can't catch up! They can't win even if they do cheat! ;D Bill T.
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: MikeBjerum on February 15, 2011, 01:15:15 PM: I should have said they will be quoted and many will accept them as the will of the people if they go against us

If we win they will be hidden and forgotten >:(
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: LittleRed on February 15, 2011, 02:32:45 PM: I don't put stock in polls either, but if I can skew things pro 2A to counter-balance those who skew it the other way, I will. Yes, this paper is liberal as are most. Florida has a pretty solid pro 2A legislature, and even Palm Beach County (uber liberal) dropped their attempt at a "hi-cap" ban.
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: kmitch200 on February 15, 2011, 02:45:11 PM: Quote from: TAB on February 15, 2011, 12:59:59 PM
the antis don't really have a web site(forums)

I put zero stock in online polls

Brady, VPC, HuffPo along with many other libtard sites.
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: tombogan03884 on February 15, 2011, 03:47:11 PM: Quote from: TAB on February 15, 2011, 12:59:59 PM
the antis don't really have a web site(forums)

I put zero stock in online polls

Another ignorant comment

http://www.democraticunderground.com/

TAB, when you don't know what you are talking about, the best way of not proving you are a dumbass is to shut up.
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: MikeBjerum on February 15, 2011, 03:50:29 PM: Quote from: tombogan03884 on February 15, 2011, 03:47:11 PM

Another ignorant comment

http://www.democraticunderground.com/

TAB, when you don't know what you are talking about, the best way of not proving you are a dumbass is to shut up.

Did you just call someone ignorant ???

Isn't that a violation of the terms of use ???

Ooooops, forgot the offended ;D
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: tombogan03884 on February 15, 2011, 03:57:04 PM: Not at all, calling him STUPID, while equally accurate would be a violation, rubbing his nose in his lack of knowledge is not.
Just like clip and Magazine, they do not mean the same thing. Even if ignorant people do use them interchangeably. ;D
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: Ulmus on February 15, 2011, 04:03:05 PM: Done! ;D

Ban 31%
Don't ban 69%

Thanks for posting this. The more we stand together against this, the more they will get the hint.
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: tombogan03884 on February 15, 2011, 05:20:04 PM: Quote from: Ulmus on February 15, 2011, 04:03:05 PM
Done! ;D

Ban 31%
Don't ban 69%

Thanks for posting this. The more we stand together against this, the more they will get the hint.

I thought you meant on calling TAB stupid ;D

Actually he isn't, on some things he is very smart.
This just isn't one of them ;D
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: GTnCFL on February 15, 2011, 05:25:39 PM: Still up.
Ban 29% (537 responses)
Get your hands off our guns. (1299 responses) 71%
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: twyacht on February 15, 2011, 06:22:42 PM: We locals refer to it, as the SCUM Sentinel,....also owned by the Chicago Tribune,....go figure....

Takes some of the WORKING FOLKS to come home and get up to speed.

72% to 28% Opposed to banning "clips"....

Like I said, it is the Scum-Sentinel...

Now their posting This is a non-scientific poll,..... >:(
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: JC5123 on February 15, 2011, 08:50:32 PM: Quote from: twyacht on February 15, 2011, 06:22:42 PM
We locals refer to it, as the SCUM Sentinel,....also owned by the Chicago Tribune,....go figure....

Takes some of the WORKING FOLKS to come home and get up to speed.

72% to 28% Opposed to banning "clips"....

Like I said, it is the Scum-Sentinel...

Now their posting This is a non-scientific poll,..... >:(

Jealous? ;D
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: crusader rabbit on February 15, 2011, 09:21:06 PM: 74-26 against the ban.
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: bjtraz on February 15, 2011, 10:05:21 PM: 75% to 25% AGAINST banning!!!
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: Ping on February 15, 2011, 11:32:08 PM: Just voted. ;)
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: Bill Stryker on February 16, 2011, 02:12:01 PM: I just voted. It is way lopsided now against the ban. 76 against to 24 for.

Not sure what difference it makes, but there were over 2100 responses.
Title: Re: Poll on regular capacity magazines
Post by: CJS3 on February 16, 2011, 09:39:54 PM: Now 77% to 23% ;)