The Down Range Forum

Member Section => Politics & RKBA => Topic started by: WatchManUSA on October 20, 2012, 05:19:44 PM

Title: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: WatchManUSA on October 20, 2012, 05:19:44 PM
Now the UN is coming to monitor this election!

"United Nations-affiliated election monitors from Europe and central Asia will be at polling places around the U.S. looking for voter suppression activities by conservative groups, a concern raised by civil rights groups during a meeting this week. The intervention has drawn criticism from a prominent conservative-leaning group combating election fraud."

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/263141-international-monitors-at-polling-places-draw-criticism-from-voter-fraud-group


Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: tombogan03884 on October 20, 2012, 05:38:54 PM
The liberal fixation with "projection" makes this a dead giveaway that we will see massive vote fraud from the Obama camp.
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: tombogan03884 on October 20, 2012, 09:18:56 PM
The local Obama office is advertising for lawyers and law students to help them fight the election results.
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: Solus on October 20, 2012, 10:20:28 PM
Voter suppression by conservative leaning groups?

I guess their job is to eliminate the competition for the usual liberal leaning groups?


"We found a few conservative groups and we came down hard on them.  We also noticed a lot of suppressive activity by liberal leaning groups, but we weren't hired to crack down on them."
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: kmitch200 on October 21, 2012, 02:41:03 AM
Liberal-leaning civil rights groups met with representatives from the OSCE this week to raise their fears about what they say are systematic efforts to suppress minority voters likely to vote for President Obama.

Does that mean the dead only get one vote?  OUTRAGE!!!!
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: mortdooley on October 21, 2012, 09:26:10 AM
I've had a thought, for every illegally cast vote all the Democrats on the ballot in that precinct have one vote voided up to and including President. If it is such a non-issue no harm will be done to the process!
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: tombogan03884 on October 21, 2012, 10:32:25 AM
I can hear the great liberal scream already.    ;D
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: Jrlobo on October 21, 2012, 10:57:51 AM
If 1000 UN monitors arrive in country, wanna bet 1000 don't leave after the election? Any takers? I figure 25 will seek asylum for political or health reasons, 100 will sneak across the border into Mexico accidentally, 500 will cross the border into Canada illegally on purpose, 100 will disappear into our countryside, 25 will get shot at the Navy Pier in Chicago and 250 will apply for green cards under the sponsorship of the SEIU, ACLU and the League of Women Voters.

I'm sponsoring a turkey shoot in Chicago on Nov 6, anyone interested?
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: MikeBjerum on October 21, 2012, 12:51:09 PM
Suppression by conservative groups  ???

As I recall it was BHO's armed Black Panthers intimidating people on the sidewalks four years ago!
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: crusader rabbit on October 21, 2012, 02:50:54 PM
Just remember guys, those blue helmeted idiots should be a good source for free 9mm and .223 ammo. ;)

The blue trucks with the UN on the side should provide an abundant supply of both calibers along with the possibility of free weapons. ;D

A turkey shoot on 6 Nov. sounds like a great American way to celebrate Odamna returning to civilian life.

Crusader
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: tombogan03884 on October 23, 2012, 09:27:35 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/apnewsbreak-co-conducts-more-citizenship-checks-003647376--election.html

APNewsBreak: CO conducts more citizenship checks

DENVER (AP) — There are 300 more suspected noncitizens on Colorado's voter rolls, Secretary of State Gessler announced Tuesday in the latest chapter of a contentious national debate over what Republicans say is vulnerability in the voting system.

The latest figures are from the 3,903 people who received letters from Gessler's office questioning their citizenship in August. During a first round of checks, Gessler said 141 others were found to be possible noncitizens based on a federal immigration database.

Critics of Gessler, who is a Republican, have questioned his political motives and argue the checks have the potential to disenfranchise eligible voters. Some of the people who have received letters questioning their citizenship have turned out to be U.S. citizens, and a few of the original 141 have maintained they are citizens.

The majority of the people who are suspected to be noncitizens and on the rolls are unaffiliated voters, which make up more than half, and Democrats, according to data provided by Gessler's office. The proportion in party registration breakdown is similar to the overall number of people who received letters in August.

State election officials did additional checks this month after obtaining immigration identification numbers from the state division of motor vehicles for all of people who received letters. They received letters because at one point they showed proof they weren't U.S. citizens, such as a green card, when obtaining a driver's license.

The latest figures mean that out of the 3,903 who received letters, 441 are believed to be non-citizens, according to the federal database, which has normally been used to check the status of legal immigrants who receive government benefits.

"It's unacceptable to have ineligible voters casting ballots in our elections," Gessler said. "We want to ensure the most accurate reliable elections possible."

Gessler's office said it has mailed letters to people believed to be ineligible voters, alerting them about the database findings so they can verify their citizenship or voluntarily remove their registrations.
Of the 441 identified as suspected noncitizens, 232 are unaffiliated, 163 are Democrats, and 37 are Republican. Gessler's office has said they did not look at party registration when checking the voter rolls for possible fraud.


Swing states, like Colorado and Florida, have gotten permission from the federal government to use the immigration database to check voter rolls. Others battleground states, like Iowa and Ohio, have also asked for permission to use the database.

Gessler and other Republican election chiefs in those states have come under heavy criticism from Democrats and voter advocacy groups, who question their political motives in a presidential election that polls show will be extremely close.

"It's suspiciously close to the election for someone who has been so partisan for this kind behavior," said Ellen Dumm, a consultant working for voting rights in Colorado.

Dumm said everyone agrees ineligible voters shouldn't cast ballots. But she argued that Gessler should focus on more important issues, like making sure the secretary of state's office website functions properly to allow people to register to vote, and coordinating with clerks on election issues before November. She said the 441 figure amounts to a "rounding error" in the greater scheme, considering there are 3.5 million registered voters in Colorado.

Gessler has forwarded the names of the suspected noncitizens, 441 in all, to county clerks for any potential challenge at the polls if they show up to cast ballots.

"Though the timing is not ideal, I felt it was important to alert these voters that the federal government says they're not citizens," Gessler said in a written statement. He also sent a letter to U.S. Attorney John Walsh in Denver on Tuesday, letting him know of the figures, telling him that many of the voters believed to be noncitizens would appear on voter rolls across the state.

Walsh announced this month that was appointing a prosecutor to look into any voter fraud in the upcoming election. Gessler said in the letter to Walsh that his office only recently completed the citizenship checks because his office didn't get access to the federal immigration database until August.
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: kmitch200 on October 24, 2012, 03:21:18 AM
Dumm (that seems appropriate) said everyone agrees ineligible voters shouldn't cast ballots. But she argued that Gessler should focus on more important issues, like making sure the secretary of state's office website functions properly Glorious Leader Sparklefarts is re-elected no matter what.
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: tombogan03884 on October 24, 2012, 08:08:47 AM
"Sparklefarts"  ???  ROFL   ;D
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: tombogan03884 on October 24, 2012, 06:33:43 PM
http://www.ijreview.com/2012/10/20053-breaking-rep-jim-morans-field-director-explains-how-to-commit-voter-fraud/?utm_source=EmailElect&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Subscriber%2335509&utm_campaign=10-24-2012%20IJ%20Review

Rep. Jim Moran’s Field Director Explains How to Commit Voter Fraud

    Home
    2012 News
    Obama
    Videos
    About Us

Email Share
Rep. Jim Moran’s Field Director Explains How to Commit Voter Fraud
Kyle Becker October 24, 2012 2:37 pm

Project Veritas has gone beyond showing how voter fraud could be done, the group’s president James O’Keefe has caught the field director of Democrat Congressman Jim Moran of Virginia explaining to an undercover reporter how it can be done. Specifically, campaign Field Director Patrick Moran, who is the House Representative’s son, explained how utility bills could be forged to misrepresent identity during voter registration.

The video is particularly salient following upon the UN’s invitation by several left-wing groups to monitor specifically for supposed “conservative voter suppression.”

UPDATE:

According to The Hill,

    Patrick Moran, the son of Virginia Rep. Jim Moran (D-Va.) and the field director for his father’s reelection bid, resigned abruptly Wednesday after a video linked him to voter fraud….

    “Patrick is well liked and was a well-respected member of the campaign team. This incident, however, was clearly an error in judgment. The campaign has accepted Patrick’s resignation, effective immediately,” the statement said.

    The resignation comes just a day after Rep. Moran and two other Virginia Democrats — Reps. Gerry Connolly and Bobby Scott — had urged the Justice Department to launch an investigation into Strategic Allied Consulting, a GOP firm linked to separate allegations of voter registration fraud in Virginia and Florida.
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: fightingquaker13 on October 24, 2012, 10:38:01 PM
Moran's a freaking crook. I helped get him elected the 1st time, as he was pro-choice and owned one of my favorite Irish pubs. It took less then six months in, to show that he was one step above the Irish mob. He and Whitey Bulger would have gotten along fine. This vote fraud thing does not surprise me at all. Hell, if they found he was running union rackets and selling votes it wouldn't amaze me. He went from a colorful local pub owner to total douche in less than a year.
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: kmitch200 on October 24, 2012, 11:48:14 PM
Moran's a freaking crook. I helped get him elected the 1st time, as he was pro-choice and owned one of my favorite Irish pubs. It took less then six months in, to show that he was one step above the Irish mob. He and Whitey Bulger would have gotten along fine. This vote fraud thing does not surprise me at all. Hell, if they found he was running union rackets and selling votes it wouldn't amaze me. He went from a colorful local pub owner to total douche in less than a year.

Or Whitey would have killed him or turned him in to the FIBBIES....no big loss either way.
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: tombogan03884 on October 25, 2012, 08:08:13 AM
Moran's a freaking crook. I helped get him elected the 1st time, ( Why doesn't this surprise me ? )as he was pro-choice and owned one of my favorite Irish pubs. (That's always a good standard to judge a potential law maker ) It took less then six months in, to show that he was one step above the Irish mob. He and Whitey Bulger would have gotten along fine. (Billy Bulger was the Ma Senate President, Whitey was just an honest crook ) This vote fraud thing does not surprise me at all. Hell, if they found he was running union rackets and selling votes it wouldn't amaze me. n (Dude, He's a democrat, those are the 2 things the party was built on ) He went from a colorful local pub owner to total douche in less than a year.
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: Jrlobo on October 25, 2012, 10:28:38 AM
FQ,

      Jim Moran is a petty crook and only has the ability to fool shallow thinkers, so I'm surprised you were fooled by him. Now if you want to see some real Democrats in action, come to the People's Republic of MD! They steal your wallets, your watches, your guns and your freedoms (especially 2nd Amendment). As for Jim being pro-choice, he was referring to the liquor sold in his tavern not killing babies. Certainly you aren't for killing babies are you FQ?
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: tombogan03884 on October 25, 2012, 10:39:32 AM
FQ,

      Jim Moran is a petty crook and only has the ability to fool shallow thinkers, so I'm surprised you were fooled by him. (You shouldn't be, this is FQ we're talking about)  Now if you want to see some real Democrats in action, come to the People's Republic of MD! They steal your wallets, your watches, your guns and your freedoms (especially 2nd Amendment). As for Jim being pro-choice, he was referring to the liquor sold in his tavern not killing babies. Certainly you aren't for killing babies are you FQ? ( actually he is, Babies yes, criminals no )
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: WatchManUSA on October 25, 2012, 04:12:42 PM
UPDATE: Texas sparks international row with election observers

http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/un-treaties/264121-texas-sparks-international-row-with-election-observers

Texas authorities have threatened to arrest international election observers, prompting a furious response from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE).

“The threat of criminal sanctions against [international] observers is unacceptable,” Janez Lenarčič, the Director of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), said in a statement. “The United States, like all countries in the OSCE, has an obligation to invite ODIHR observers to observe its elections.”

More details are available in the linked article.
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: Solus on October 25, 2012, 04:17:05 PM
Well, the nice people at the OSCE are forgetting two things.

First is that they will be in Texas, not Europe and second, they will not be in Europe, but Texas.
Title: Re: International monitors at US polling places
Post by: JC5123 on October 25, 2012, 04:47:07 PM
Ok, so let me see if I have this all straight....

The UN will be monitoring our elections because they say CONSRVATIVE groups will be engaged in voter suppression
Left wing groups have commited to rioting if BHO loses.
Democrats have been caught REPEATEDLY in voter fraud (Wasn't it Iowa that BHO wasn't supposed to be on the ballot?)

Here is what I see happening....
I believe it will be a landslide with BHO getting less than 45% of the vote and losing in the Electoral College by 100+ However I think that we will witness for the first time a not-so-peaceful transition. I think that BHO will try every executive order in the book including declaring Martial Law when his useful idiots protest. He will desparately try to stay in power by any means he can (he already has an army of lawyers ready to sue if he loses) If he wins, it will be even worse. I think he will try to disband congress and declare himself supreme leader. I think in that case many states (at least the red ones that can and WILL take care of themselves will split.

Sorry for the ramble, just my thoughts.