The Down Range Forum
Member Section => Down Range Cafe => Topic started by: PegLeg45 on January 03, 2013, 03:21:27 PM
-
Georgia Sheriff Rejects Supplier's Anti-Liberty Stance
Dana Safety Supply, a well known police supplier of clothing, guns, and gear, with an outlet in Sugar Hill, Georgia, sells firearms to non-police officers. Recently, however, it announced that it would stop selling self loading rifles to anybody but "Law Enforcement individuals." Dana Safety Supply states that they will still sell bolt action and lever action rifles as well as pistols and revolvers to non-law enforcement individuals. What this means is that Dana Safety Supply will no longer sell an AR15 rifle unless the purchaser is a police officer.
This new policy has ruffled the feathers of Georgia citizens who buy guns, many of whom declared that they will no longer hand their money over to Dana Safety Supply. One of those citizens is Oconee County Sheriff Scott Berry, last year's President of the Georgia Sheriff's Association.
Sheriff Berry sent the following letter to Dana Safety Supply:
Sirs,
It is my understanding that you have stopped selling self loading rifles to members of the general public in favor of selling them to law enforcement officers only.
I deeply regret that decision. As such, this agency will no longer seek bids from or purchase from DSS.
Thank you for your time and attention to this email.
Sheriff Scott Berry
Oconee County Georgia Sheriffs Office
The Sheriff said that Dana Safety Supply was "an excellent source of products that we buy," but he could not condone and support the retailer's new policy.
The Sheriff said that he would not have written the letter if the retailer were simply trying to hold onto existing inventory to fulfill pending law enforcement contracts, "but to refuse to sell any self loading rifle to a citizen is just too much for me to bear."
The Sheriff's letter went "viral" on the internet last night, as activists for the right to bear arms posted his letter in online forums. He said there has been a huge outpouring of support for his action from the general public, but so far, no response whatsoever from Dana Safety Supply.
The Sheriff is resolved to hold firm on his decision not to purchase equipment from the retailer. While he affirmed that he likes the local management and staff, he emphasized that responsibility for any negative effects fall squarely in the lap of Dana Safety Supply's corporate owner, Scott-McRae Group. "Their corporate position is just something that Dana Safety Supply will have to live with," said Sheriff Berry, "or change."
http://www.examiner.com/article/georgia-sheriff-rejects-supplier-s-anti-liberty-stance?CID=examiner_alerts_article
-
Gotta love the South!
Crusader Rabbit
American by birth. Southern by the Grace of God.
-
A man after my own heart. thats exactly why I don't like sti.
-
You know, we've seen several businesses jump Anti 2A and then recant when they realize their foot has a hole in it....as will their bottom line.
Some how I think I would have respected them more if they has said they stand by their decision even if it does cost them customers and money....because it is what we thought was the right thing to do.
I'd still not deal with them, as I don't after they are 'born again' either.
We will see how these folks fare.
-
A man after my own heart. thats exactly why I don't like sti.
What's the story with STI ?
-
its has 2 parts. 1st they cut off all sales to ca that were not leo and made a huge stink about it. Shortly after ronnie barret stoped selling to ca( which I support as it includded leos) they made a big stink about stoping sales in ca. only it had been years since they had sold a gun to a civi in ca. yet they made it sound like they did some great thing and it was going to cost them all this money. when infact all they were doing is playing fallow the leader in hopes of making a buck.
-
Vague recollections..
I read an article like that about Kimber cutting off civilian sales in CA, right after they introduced a model that they named for L.A.'s "Elite Tactical Unit", whatever it was called..
Is my memory still on a steady decline or am I recalling correctly?
-
Vague recollections..
I read an article like that about Kimber cutting off civilian sales in CA, right after they introduced a model that they named for L.A.'s "Elite Tactical Unit", whatever it was called..
Is my memory still on a steady decline or am I recalling correctly?
I remember the story....only other details I can recall is that the forward cocking grooves were thought by some to resemble the NAZI SS logo.... They were the initials of that tactical unit I believe.
-
I remember the story....only other details I can recall is that the forward cocking grooves were thought by some to resemble the NAZI SS logo.... They were the initials of that tactical unit I believe.
The Special Investigative Squad (SIS) gun. Make your own determination:
(http://www.proguns.com/images/kimber-siscustom.jpg)
-
I never heard anything about the markings being Nazi-esque or whatever. Just that there was some sort of hypocritical thing about it all..
Pretty gun!! That was kinda the beginning of the reemerging "ubiquitous-ness" of the 1911, it seemed, at the time..
-
One of his deputies runs the Shooters Legacy forum at http://shooterslegacy.net/forum/
-
This may seem nit picky, but it is like clips and magazines to me. I know I have erred in the past myself, but I am trying:
If a firearms company is selling to law enforcement they are selling to civilians unless said law enforcement is a military unit. An easy way to tell the difference is to ask the question "Can you quit your job anytime without going to jail?" If you can you are a civilian.
That doesn't change the issues of this thread, because I believe that our nation was founded with the intention that the power was to remain with the citizen as opposed to the elected official or special group.
-
Yes, it is nit picky, it is also incorrect.
Military and Law Enforcement are both gun toting representatives of Govt force .
Therefore a company that only sells to law enforcement personnel is selling to members of an arm of Govt not "We the people".
-
A company that sells to law enforcement is separating one group of civilians above another group of civilians. If you are going to sell it to a city police officer or a state trooper, why not ABC security?
-
Because ABC Security is not a Govt entity.
-
Because ABC Security is not a Govt entity.
Does that mean the meter reader, the librarian, or the plow driver should get preferential treatment in weapons and accessories? These are all employees of government entities as well, and many of these employees would have no problem demonstrating their firearms skills at qualifying levels for POST.
-
They are not "armed entities" of Govt.
Although they are supposed to report unusual activity, for example the water and electric utilities will report if your usage increases .
Many people arrested for growing pot are targeted because of that.
-
What's this I heard that Bill Ruger supported the first AWB? Is that true? If so, why are we buying guns from Ruger like there is no tomorrow? I am confused.
-
What's this I heard that Bill Ruger supported the first AWB? Is that true? If so, why are we buying guns from Ruger like there is no tomorrow? I am confused.
Mostly because he's been dead for 15 or so years and the company has been under new management.
-
Mostly because he's been dead for 15 or so years and the company has been under new management.
And doing much better....
Bill Ruger is noted to have said, "No honest man needs more than 10 rounds." This kind of attitude is unfortunately reflected by members of the gun community that would not mind of another AWB passed because it wouldn't affect their guns.