The Down Range Forum
Member Section => Politics & RKBA => Topic started by: tombogan03884 on January 28, 2013, 09:41:14 AM
-
http://clashdaily.com/2013/01/pitbull-attitude-alert-2232013-a-day-of-resistance/
John Hawkins- Yes, Barack Obama did beat Mitt Romney in 2012. But, he was reelected as President– not king. Unfortunately, no one seems to have told the Republicans in Congress that because they’re looking for any excuse they can find to roll over for him like whipped dogs.
Meanwhile, many conservatives are moping around because they seem to have concluded that if Barack Obama could win in 2012, then it’s all over.
But, what if it’s not?
What if our problem wasn’t our principles, but our candidate, our get-out-the-vote operation, our refusal to do minority outreach and the same passive, wimpy, apprehensive attitude that the Republican Party seems poised to adopt today in the face of an aggressive President who is determined to slam a liberal agenda down the throats of the American people?
Instead, what if the same grassroots conservatives who propelled the Republican Party to its best election cycle in 50 years back in 2010 are still there? In fact, what if there are more conservatives and even Democrats, who aren’t willing to give up their Second Amendment Rights just because Barack Obama has decided it’s fine to exploit the tragic deaths of children at Sandy Hook to further his liberal agenda?
While Barack Obama is calling for Americans to give up their freedom, their rights, and their guns, we’re calling for Americans to resist. We’re calling on Tea Partiers, moderate Republicans, Libertarians and even moderate Democrats to stand up one month from today, on the 23rd of February and say, “No more!” Right Wing News is joining Dustin Stockton, Western Representation PAC and The Tea Party.net in calling for rallies all across the nation next month on the 23rd. It’ll be a Day of Resistance where gun owners and patriots can peacefully gather and show Barack Obama, the media, and the knockkneed Republicans in Congress that we may have lost a battle last November, but we haven’t lost the war. Don’t meekly give up your 2nd Amendment rights when you can stand with us and RESIST!
PS: Over the next few weeks, look for rallies to be announced, big name conservatives to help spread this idea and Tea Partiers all across the country to step up to the challenge. If you need help getting a rally set up in your local area or would like some help getting speakers, reach out to Dustin Stockton at wrpac@westernpac.org.
John Hawkins is the hawk behind http://www.rightwingnews.com/.
Read more: http://clashdaily.com/2013/01/pitbull-attitude-alert-2232013-a-day-of-resistance/#ixzz2JHk0kiNG
Get more Clash on ClashDaily.com, Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.
-
Preach it brother!
-
I'll be there. Not one step back. Its time for peaceful and lawful protest and us to stop apologizing.
-
Interesting!
-
Here's J.W.Rawles take:
http://www.survivalblog.com/2013/01/nunc-pro-tunc-the-coming-day-of-burn-barrels-and-blessings.html
which made me wonder how many FFL holders would mind too much if someone were to nicely 'hold up' their store and demand only the "yellow forms" (edit: 'and or software hardware upon which such records are stored'...for the pedants out there :P) ? - plausible deniability on inspection day!
-
I'll be there. Not one step back. Its time for peaceful and lawful effective protest and us to stop apologizing.
We've been using "peaceful, and lawful" for 25 years .
How's that worked out ?
Did "Gay rights" activists stick with "peaceful, and lawful"?
Have Unions ever relied on "peaceful, and lawful" ?
Did the Temperance Movement rely on "peaceful, and lawful" ?
Did the Women's Suffragettes rely on "peaceful, and lawful" ?
Did the abolitionists stick to "peaceful, and lawful" ?
What about the Founders ?
Were their method "peaceful, and lawful" ?
-
We've been using "peaceful, and lawful" for 25 years .
How's that worked out ?
Did "Gay rights" activists stick with "peaceful, and lawful"?
Have Unions ever relied on "peaceful, and lawful" ?
Did the Temperance Movement rely on "peaceful, and lawful" ?
Did the Women's Suffragettes rely on "peaceful, and lawful" ?
Did the abolitionists stick to "peaceful, and lawful" ?
What about the Founders ?
Were their method "peaceful, and lawful" ?
I imagine they all started out that way but don't know if they kept it up for 25 years.
To what extremes did their 'effective' protests/methods go?
-
I imagine they all started out that way but don't know if they kept it up for 25 years.
To what extremes did their 'effective' protests/methods go?
Did "Gay rights" activists stick with "peaceful, and lawful"? Parades featuring nudity and simulated sex acts
Have Unions ever relied on "peaceful, and lawful" ? Bombings, arson, murder, and riots.
Did the Temperance Movement rely on "peaceful, and lawful" ? Carry Nation and others smashing up bars and menacing patrons with deadly weapons
Did the Women's Suffragettes rely on "peaceful, and lawful" ? Civil disobedience
Did the abolitionists stick to "peaceful, and lawful" ? Theft, smuggling, receiving stolen property, conspiracy, murder, arson armed insurrection
What about the Founders ?
Were their method "peaceful, and lawful" ? Theft, destruction of property, aggravated assault, riot, arson and conspiracy.
Those are what I can recall off the top of my head .
Doesn't sound like "peaceful, and lawful" to me.
Then of course there is the civil rights movement with Peaceful Martin Luther King in the forefront and the spectre of the Black Panthers and burning cities looming behind him.
-
Nice we will be there
-
This the line...
Not one step more!
Not one.
Crusader Rabbit