The Down Range Forum

Member Section => Defense and Tactics => Topic started by: PegLeg45 on August 14, 2013, 03:32:42 PM

Title: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: PegLeg45 on August 14, 2013, 03:32:42 PM
**EDIT**
To be very clear on the topic: I DO NOT advocate using the .22lr for self defense if you have any other choice available. In a tight spot, the .22 might work, but IMHO, the biggest caliber you can shoot consistently accurate is the best.


Not to stir up old conflicts, but I ran across a posting by Grant Cunningham on FB linking to an article by Greg Ellifritz and his take on why the .22 is NOT the optimum choice.

I have included all three links to the relevant articles, from Grant's note on his website, the original American Handgunner article by Ellifritz, and his subsequent follow-up due to the feedback he received.


From Grant Cunningham:
Quote
Would you use a .22 for self defense?

One of the interesting things to come out of Greg Ellifritz's study of ammunition effectiveness was how well the .22 Long Rifle worked - or, at least, appeared to work. By some measures, it performed better than the vaunted .45 ACP! There is a small but dedicated group of people out there who seized upon this data as proof that the .22 is in fact the most deadly cartridge ever made by man. After all, they insist, the figures don’t lie!

This is what's known as anomalous data: data which doesn't fit the expected distribution. How, then, do we explain it?

Ellifritz took this on in a recent blog post, and it's worth reading to understand all of the variables which go into something as complex as bullet performance - and why single numbers, as preferred by some researchers, are never enough to tell the whole story. Be sure to read the comments as well, as there are some very intelligent analyses being done by his readers too.

-=[ Grant ]=-

http://www.grantcunningham.com/blog_files/bacfa785e21af37dbb92f63af0f1773c-1227.html




From American Handgunner, by Greg Ellifritz
Quote
Defensive Carry
Is It Caliber Or Equipment?

http://americanhandgunner.com/defensive-carry/



Follow-up by Ellifritz:
Quote
Using the .22 for Self Defense

Since my handgun stopping power study was published last month in American Handgunner Magazine, I've received several questions from readers about my data.  I expected to be castigated by all the big bullet aficionados for reporting honest data about the “mouse gun” calibers.  That wasn't what I received.
 
All the email that I got was from .22 advocates telling me that I misinterpreted my data and that the .22 is the best defensive cartridge ever invented.  Really?  I’m open to an honest discussion about the relative merits of carrying a .22 in certain situations, but I promise you that if I was to grab a gun right now, knowing that I would be getting into a gunfight, my .22s would be VERY low on the list.

- See more at:

http://www.activeresponsetraining.net/using-the-22-for-self-defense

Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: tombogan03884 on August 15, 2013, 01:56:24 PM
I'd use a rock for SD if that was all I had .
A rock, like a .22, would not be my first choice no matter what some internet genius has to say about it.
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: TAB on August 15, 2013, 08:26:23 PM
i think a 22 semi auto rifle would be a very good sd weapon for a small person or someone with a disabilty. Would I want something bigger? Yes,  would I feel unarmed?  No.
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: fightingquaker13 on August 16, 2013, 10:08:16 AM
i think a 22 semi auto rifle would be a very good sd weapon for a small person or someone with a disabilty. Would I want something bigger? Yes,  would I feel unarmed?  No.
If its  shortish range rifle fight you could do worse than a 10/22 with 20 rounders, probably better than a .308 bolt. But that's a pretty specific set of requirements.
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: Magoo541 on August 16, 2013, 11:28:59 AM
IMHO just carry the biggest gun you can, only you can determine what that is.  Then all the arguing becomes wasted energy/time that could be doing something productive.

To each his own.
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: tstand on January 05, 2014, 06:29:08 PM
This article convinced me

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2012/06/foghorn/ask-foghorn-22l-for-self-defense/
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: Solus on January 05, 2014, 07:02:03 PM
Each night I pray that should I be forced into a SD shootout that the bad guys are all .22LR Fan Boys.

I can't think of any round I'd rather have them using...not sure if a ball bearing in a sling shot is ahead or behind it though

Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: tombogan03884 on January 06, 2014, 02:21:43 PM
Each night I pray that should I be forced into a SD shootout that the bad guys are all .22LR Fan Boys.

I can't think of any round I'd rather have them using...not sure if a ball bearing in a sling shot is ahead or behind it though



.22 has higher velocity than .25 auto or .32 ACP.and I think if you go by weight AND velocity the sling shotted ball bearing beats all 3.
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: TAB on January 06, 2014, 02:34:59 PM
25 is the weakest common centerfire round i know of. Even a 22 long is stronger from a rifle.  22 short is the weakest i know of.
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: MikeBjerum on January 06, 2014, 04:41:54 PM
1.  Gun must be easily carried or it will not be carried;
2.  Gun must be easily and accurately shot by shooter;
3.  Ammunition must be available and affordable for both practice and carry;
4.  Gun and ammunition must go bang every time the trigger is pulled and not when it isn't;
5.  It must be viewed as a negative by the attacker.

Any gun that goes bang and leaves leaking holes in the body will be a deterrent.  Unless your name is Radio Boy, you do not have tattooed across your forehead that it is only a .22 nobody will know you have a small caliber.

I carry a 1911 Gov in .45acp because I can, I like it, and ...  Many people are killed by .22lr by self inflicted, accident and intentional.  Contrary to popular belief the gangsters that forged the way for today's wanna be punks did not carry big guns.  They carried little pocket guns and did just fine murdering with them.

I know what I want and what works for me.  You know what you want and what works for you.  Refer all others to the list above or similar lists made by people much smarter than me. 

But quit ridiculing somebody for their choice of dependable firearm that they will practice with and carry.
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: tombogan03884 on January 07, 2014, 02:12:11 PM
1.  Gun must be easily carried or it will not be carried;
2.  Gun must be easily and accurately shot by shooter;
3.  Ammunition must be available and affordable for both practice and carry;
4.  Gun and ammunition must go bang every time the trigger is pulled and not when it isn't;
5.  It must be viewed as a negative by the attacker.


I agree with what you posted but your "Rule #1" is really the only one that matters in the .22 debate.
As an example, a totally reliable .44 magnum left home is less use than even a .25 that you have with you.
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: MikeBjerum on January 08, 2014, 08:00:57 AM
The point Tom is that a self defense tool is a self defense tool.  Two of the items at the top of my gripes list are the .22 for self defense and birdshot for home defense.  We need to quit worrying about if it is big enough and bad enough, and just follow the basic rules of avoidance and self defense.

Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: Solus on January 08, 2014, 09:41:30 AM
The point Tom is that a self defense tool is a self defense tool.  Two of the items at the top of my gripes list are the .22 for self defense and birdshot for home defense.  We need to quit worrying about if it is big enough and bad enough, and just follow the basic rules of avoidance and self defense.

m58, I'm not sure of your position here.   

Are you saying that if you were advising someone who is capable and able to use standard SD pistols from the .22LR to the .45ACP  effectively and they were leaning towards carrying the .22LR as their primary SD weapon, you would tell them it is a fine choice?
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: MikeBjerum on January 08, 2014, 11:37:32 AM
I am not recommending any caliber.  I am stating that choice of style and power is personal. 

I gave my list of how to choose.  For an experienced shooter I would add "The largest caliber you can comfortably shoot and control.  However beyond that, having a gun that is 100% reliable and that you practice with on a regular basis, and that is with you at all times is the most important factor.
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: Hazcat on December 11, 2014, 10:45:14 PM
I am not recommending any caliber.  I am stating that choice of style and power is personal. 

I gave my list of how to choose. For an experienced any shooter I would add "The largest caliber you can comfortably shoot and control.  However beyond that, having a gun that is 100% reliable and that you practice with on a regular basis, and that is with you at all times is the most important factor.
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: tombogan03884 on December 12, 2014, 06:11:12 AM
Bigger holes bleed faster.
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: MikeBjerum on December 14, 2014, 04:44:53 PM
Bigger holes bleed faster.

True, but misses don't leak
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: Desertrat on January 20, 2015, 12:47:05 PM
It would not be MY first choice....but for people like my wife who do not like "big bangs", I would
rather she used her .22 than something she would be afraid to shoot.
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: Hazcat on January 20, 2015, 07:34:36 PM
I absolutely understand some peoples' need for using the .22 for SD BUT there is another and I think better, option.

It is the 5.7.  Main reason is that it is a CENTER fire cartridge therefor MUCH less likely to misfire.  It is still a very soft recoil and has lots of rounds, good penetration and good energy dump in the target.
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: tombogan03884 on January 21, 2015, 06:43:14 AM
The 5.7 is what Maj. Hassan Nidal used in his Ft Hood terror rampage. I would look at the results of that before selecting that caliber. There is also the Kel Tec PMR 30. 30 Rounds of .22mag in a pistol.
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: Hazcat on January 21, 2015, 11:00:15 AM
The 5.7 is what Maj. Hassan Nidal used in his Ft Hood terror rampage. I would look at the results of that before selecting that caliber. There is also the Kel Tec PMR 30. 30 Rounds of .22mag in a pistol.

.22 mag is still rimfire and more prone to misfires.
Title: Re: More on the .22 for SD Argument
Post by: Shoot the guns of history on January 21, 2015, 04:35:08 PM
a 22 in the hand beats a rock any day.
I carry either a 1911 or 38 depending on what I am wearing and going, but there is one gun that is a must have, my NAA mini. I can carry it in my watch pocket or wear it as a belt buckle.