I started looking through the comments and couldn't come up with anything new other than some bad language that was tastefully left out of the previous comments.
I have always wondered why the American Civil Liberties Union defended only the rights of criminals and shitheels. Seeing their comments on the second amendment and the SCOTUS ruling make it a little clearer. They're not just a bunch of liberal lawyers, they're a bunch of assholes who just happen to be liberal lawyers. Big difference, I guess.
Hey are we seeing some sort of schism with the ACLU? The following is from the Nevada ACLU website....
ACLU of Nevada Supports Individual’s Right to Bear Arms
Submitted by Paige Thie on Fri, 06/27/2008 - 23:08.
In light of the United States Supreme Court's decision concerning the D.C. handgun ban (District of Columbia v. Heller) the ACLU of Nevada considers it important to clearly state its position regarding the right to bear arms. The Nevada ACLU respects the individual's right to bear arms subject to constitutionally permissible regulations. The ACLU of Nevada will defend this right as it defends other constitutional rights. This policy was formulated by our afilliate Board in light of both the U.S. Constitution and the clearly-stated individual right to bear arms as set out in the Nevada Constitution's Declaration of Rights.
http://www.aclunv.org/aclu-nevada-supports-individual%E2%80%99s-right-bear-arms