The Down Range Forum
Member Section => Down Range Cafe => Topic started by: Solus on January 13, 2015, 07:35:34 PM
-
I know it isn't news to anyone here, but good to see support at this level.
Too bad this Interpol guy can't get elected
Interpol: allowing citizens to carry guns in public is most effective way to prevent terror attacks
How long would the jihadis at Charlie Hebdo, Westgate, Mumbai – and many other terror attacks to come – be able to continue killing if they were surrounded by armed citizens? Interpol states that the only way to stop such attacks is to allow citizens to carry arms (the only alternative to an armed citizenry is “extraordinary security” surrounding every area where many people meet – train stations, super markets, schools, etc. – which is of course completely unrealistic). If guns are illegal, only violent criminals, fanatic jihadis and our over-worked, understaffed police will have them.
http://10news.dk/interpol-allowing-citizens-to-carry-guns-in-public-is-most-effective-way-to-prevent-terror-attacks/
-
While I agree carrying weapons increases security for the masses in a civil society. There is another more sure fire way that the media is too politically correct to address. That is simply not allowing the Muslim population in any given country to increase. Or else not allow it to exist at ANY LEVEL. If you look at any nation on this Earth that has violence issues involving Muslims, it is because they've allowed their population of Muslim inhabitants to get beyond a certain percentage. Then, like clockwork, the violence erupts.
If we had the same Muslim population as France does now, we would be having the same issues. This has proven itself out all over the world.
When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well. Here’s how it works. As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens.
This is the case in:
United States — Muslim 0.6%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1.8%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%
At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.
This is happening in:
Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply.
This is occurring in:
France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. This is happening in all of the "No Go Zones" in France as we speak. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
This is why, there is no such thing as a, "good Muslim". Everywhere they inhabit in sufficient numbers, violence increases. You don't require pesticides if you live in an area where they don't exist.
-
It's very important to understand the FACT, ALL Muslims are educated from the exact same book.
(http://i812.photobucket.com/albums/zz50/billt460/Koran.jpg) (http://s812.photobucket.com/user/billt460/media/Koran.jpg.html)
Granted most of the ones who live here don't yank out their prayer rugs, and point their asses to the sky 5 times a day, but they all support the ones who do. Therein lies the danger. Much like the Catholic Church, all the knee floppers and chest beaters command the power, (Clerics and Imam's). The peaceful majority are irrelevant, just as they were with the Nazi's. The hard core dedicated, are the ones who ALWAYS drive the agenda. The rest will follow like Lemmings, and in the process give credence to the phrase, "Ask me no questions, and I'll tell you no lies".
-
Kill enough of them, and they'll quit. The rag-headed, rug kneeling, allah praying, sand-flea infested, goat f....k, camel jockey's that is. We need to go to where they live/originate, make war, leave nothing but ruins and widows. Come home. Rinse and repeat.
I'll volunteer to go in the first wave.
-
Kill enough of them, and they'll quit. The rag-headed, rug kneeling, allah praying, sand-flea infested, goat f....k, camel jockey's that is. We need to go to where they live/originate, make war, leave nothing but ruins and widows. Come home. Rinse and repeat.
I'll volunteer to go in the first wave.
Easier and less risky to simply air burst around 3 megatons over Mecca. Wait until they're all there walking in that big circle, with that wire "music" playing in the background.
-
Tremendous psychological move to nuke Mecca.
Muslims believe that when the the war between Islam and the rest of the world is hot enough, Allah will act on the side of his soldiers for a decisive victory.
Well, I doubt anything will make the war hotter than a radioactive Mecca....and then we all get to see how Allah helps out.
-
Easier and less risky to simply air burst around 3 megatons over Mecca. Wait until they're all there walking in that big circle, with that wire "music" playing in the background.
I vote for this one!
-
Pat Condell "Nothing to do with Islam"