The Down Range Forum

Member Section => Tactical Rifle & Carbine => Topic started by: RK0281 on September 13, 2008, 04:54:40 PM

Title: AK vs. AR
Post by: RK0281 on September 13, 2008, 04:54:40 PM
End of the world which one do you want?
Title: Re: AK vs. AR
Post by: Pathfinder on September 13, 2008, 05:07:29 PM
AK is excellent for Russian peasants who don't know much more than working swine

Need something with more kick, not a 5.56, more like a 7.62, but with more oomph than the AK round. I would go with an M-14 SOCOM II - full-grown, grown up cartridge, short and light(er) weapon, capable for short range massive firepower as well as reaching out and touching someone at long distances.

my 100,000,000 Icelandic kroner.
Title: Re: AK vs. AR
Post by: CurrieS103 on September 13, 2008, 06:12:28 PM
End of the world?  AR fo rthe wife,  SOCOM for me.
Title: Re: AK vs. AR
Post by: Hazcat on September 13, 2008, 06:39:54 PM
Gotta be 308 or 30-06
Title: Re: AK vs. AR
Post by: HAWKFISH on September 13, 2008, 06:42:22 PM
End of the world? Then would it really matter? ... I like them both. Both are good choices. But, I guess if it was at the end of the world times.. probably the AK. Why? Because if the price of ammo does continue to increase like the last few years.. by the time the end of the world comes... there would be no way I could have affored any 5.56.. so I guess since I could find some 7.62x39mm far cheaper.. I guess it would come in handy to actual be able to use the AK...    unless..  unless...  lol one had a 7.62x39mm AR....    ;)   Well, so there you have it..  get both in one lol.
Title: Re: AK vs. AR
Post by: 2HOW on September 13, 2008, 07:23:36 PM
If you are shooting at distance you want a .308 or similar , 200 yds or under a AK  is my choice.
Title: Re: AK vs. AR
Post by: twyacht on September 13, 2008, 07:41:03 PM
As far as a end of the world scenario? Hell, a 50 BMG would be fine. ;D

AK or AR, kinda tough,... Would there be a group of "Red Dawn" rebels to carry on? I would settle for a AR-10 in .308.

BUT, I would have to give kudos to an AK for durability, and ammo. Saiga makes a nice AK in .308 as well, and probably have one of each.

End of the world? My truck is getting filled with them all....Including a "Tommy Gun" ::)

Anyone know a deal on a BAR?
Title: Re: AK vs. AR
Post by: jnevis on September 13, 2008, 09:17:43 PM
Simple: AK.  More of them out there than anything else, and ammo is available just about as easiily.  Yes given the choice an M14 is more versitile (larger game hunting and defense) but availability is key.  I can go ANYWHERE in the world and find an AK and ammo.
Title: Re: AK vs. AR
Post by: Big Frank on September 14, 2008, 02:14:44 AM
Either one as long as it's a 12 gauge.  ;D
Title: Re: AK vs. AR
Post by: tombogan03884 on September 14, 2008, 12:58:44 PM
If you are in a situation where you are hunting deer one day and fighting attackers the next, or constantly moving so you may not have the chance or equipment to keep your rifle as clean as at the range, or in an area where shots are less than 200 yards, AK or SKS is the only way to go. In an EOW survival situation .223 does not have the versatility to be an only rifle.
Title: Re: AK vs. AR
Post by: DDMac on September 14, 2008, 01:12:00 PM
Now that I voted AK, for all the previously stated sound reasons, I need to go get one.

RK0281, how much time do we have??? Six months same as cash a good idea?

Mac.
Title: Re: AK vs. AR
Post by: DesertMarine on September 14, 2008, 05:18:20 PM
I'll take the AR or SOCOM for end of the world.  While AK ammo is/might be cheaper at that time, .223 or .308 will probably be more readlily available.  Between the AR and SOCOM probably the SOCOM for power.
Title: Re: AK vs. AR
Post by: tombogan03884 on September 14, 2008, 07:09:32 PM
I'll take the AR or SOCOM for end of the world.  While AK ammo is/might be cheaper at that time, .223 or .308 will probably be more readlily available.  Between the AR and SOCOM probably the SOCOM for power.

You may have a good point there  Desert Marine, .308 would also be better for larger game but for what you would pay for a SOCOM you could buy 2 AK's or 4 SKS's, Or one of either and more ammo  ;D
Title: Re: AK vs. AR
Post by: fullautovalmet76 on September 14, 2008, 08:48:34 PM
In terms of the mission requirement, I have to go with an AK. I have both in semi-auto and one AK-variant as a full auto. The Valmet will flat out rock when called upon! Someone brought up the M-14, which is a great second choice.
Title: Re: AK vs. AR
Post by: DesertMarine on September 14, 2008, 09:16:53 PM
You may have a good point there  Desert Marine, .308 would also be better for larger game but for what you would pay for a SOCOM you could buy 2 AK's or 4 SKS's, Or one of either and more ammo  ;D

Ok, but for your reasons then I would go with the AR.  I see more ARs available and at that time, might even be at discount.  For ammo availablity a 30-06 would be a better choice except for no military type weapons readily available for it.  Every little store throughout the country has 30-06.  Marines of the 5th & 6th Marine Regiments were making up to 800 yd shots during WWI with Springfield 03A3s with iron sights.
Title: Re: AK vs. AR
Post by: twyacht on September 16, 2008, 08:44:14 PM
Torture tests don't rule out either one as a good choice.

Rinsing it off in the pond,.... than 1100 rds. for the AR.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5CQOvdYW6c&NR=1

and for the AK,....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jn9WcjsSr_I&feature=related

Well, How bout that?