Got this in an email. It does tend to explain a lot of "blunders" that have been made.
Any thoughts?
Obama can stop ISIS by not sending them any more weapons or money. Obama's administration sent weapons, funds and training to "moderate rebels" in Syria just under a year ago. A few months later, a group called ISIS came out of Syria and invaded Iraq. Where are the "moderate rebels" then? Where did the money and the weapons sent to "moderate rebels" go? The time frame for these events is less than a year. It should come as no surprise that there were never any "moderate rebels" in Syria, and that Obama was actually arming what is now known as ISIS and at that time was known simply as Al-Qaeda. Putting links in this message will make it harder to get it through the spam filters, but if you google for Obama weapons moderate rebels in Syria, you'll find plenty of information supporting these assertions.
If you recall, just last summer, Obama's administration was pushing for air strikes on Syria, based on the pretext of gas attacks on civilians. Obama's administration claimed these attacks were carried out by Assad's forces, but there was never any evidence to back up these claims. Testimonies from international commentators and even the rebels themselves indicated that it was the rebels that carried out these attacks to try to get air support from Obama's administration, in addition to the weapons, funding and training. Again, no links, but if you google for gas attacks Syria rebels, you'll find plenty of information. As this information was becoming public in the fall of last year, the mainstream media quietly swept the issue under the rug, perhaps you don't even remember now that all this has happened.
The American public and armed forces were against air strikes that would help Al-Qaeda in Syria (ISIS), so Obama's administration settled for simply sending weapons and money to them, until now. It might seem counterproductive to now call for air strikes on ISIS, but once these air strikes are authorized, who is to say that Assad's assets won't also be hit. In helping authorize air strikes on Syrian targets, ISIS will have fulfilled its purposes as an instrument of Obama's foreign policy.
You want to know the real identity of the masked terrorist beheading people in videos? His name is Obama bin Laden. Obviously Obama doesn't do the dirty work personally and he is not solely responsible, but as the face of his administration he is also the face behind the masks of the terrorists, because it is his administration that funded, armed, and trained the terrorists that are carrying out countless atrocities in Syria and Iraq today. These terrorists are just disposable tools, created for a limited purpose, probably not even smart enough to understand their role. Is it not conspicuous that they are attacking other Muslims and have not attacked Israel? Aren't their handlers and creators at least equally responsible for the crimes of their puppets? If we condemn ISIS and Al-Qaeda, should we not also condemn those that funded, armed and trained them? If we condemn these terrorists to death, should we not similarly condemn their handlers?
MBTV
Forum Index
Help
Calendar
Contact Info
Register as a member
