Hi M25,
I think the photographic comparison is a fair one. I was always a fair draftsman and love to draw. One element that you are seeing is the paintings that seem the most photographic, as far as the seeming detail, are the larger paintings. When they are reduced from 30" x 42" down to fit your computer screen, they appear VERY tight.
Designing motion pictures is a unique discipline, and I always said that my paintings made me a better art director, and my film work made me a better painter. My film work was viewed in a two-dimensional format. The final work was projected onto a flat screen. Part of my job was to create the depth to add the third dimension. As often as possible this was accomplished by the inclusion of foreground, mid-ground and background. This is also fully explored in my paintings.
More important to both artistic endeavors, is establishing the light source and using it to full, visual advantage. I do love light, and could not do either job without it. I show my appreciation by making it the lead character whenever possible.
Later,
Bill (k39noodles)