Michael,
Great coverage of the new product launch! I've only seen the new Ruger SR9 here at DRTV, so I haven't held one yet. But I do see one thing that bothers me:
The new SR9's thumb safety looks like a generally good thing, in keeping with the other efforts to mimic the 1911's ergonomics. However, it appears to be placed so far to the rear that it could only be engaged by the thumb while drawing from the holster. It looks as if it's too far back to have the thumb ride on it "On-Oafe" while in a "Ready Position" - in order to stay on-safe until a target has been identified and a decision has been made to disengage the safety and shoot.
Also, this SR9 thumb-safety appears to be too far back and too high to have the thumb ride on it WHILE shooting with a "high thumb" grip. The "high thumb" grip with the thumb riding the thumb-safety actually wedges the web of the hand as high up on the back-strap as it can go - under the "beavertail" area. The high grip is one key to rapid recoil-recovery (as an asside, a high grip is impossibe with all modern SIG pistols, and my only serious gripe with SIG - they have a very high bore-line). 30 years ago, some of the IPSC Masters shot 1911's with a low thumb, but not any more. It just doesn't work as well.
If the current Ruger SR9 thumb safety can be extended forward into a flat paddle for the thumb to ride on, it appears that it would permit a proper "high thumb" grip.
Can you tell if the safety is made of a casting, or is it stamped sheet metal? If it's cast, it can probably be extended (or replaced with a new casting in an extended configuration). This might be worth discussing with Wayne Novak, if you can convince him to give it a "going over."
Cheers!
- KBS