Author Topic: Did Dianne Digette purjor herself as "Expert Witness"?  (Read 5075 times)

Capt Cook

  • Forum Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Did Dianne Digette purjor herself as "Expert Witness"?
« on: May 28, 2013, 03:15:42 PM »
OK, somebody correct me if I am wrong but did Dianne Digette go on record as an "Expert" on guns when she made the new laws in Colorado? If she did, then she purjored herself and that would make the new laws invalid would it not.

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8665
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: Did Dianne Digette purjor herself as "Expert Witness"?
« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2013, 03:20:36 PM »
OK, somebody correct me if I am wrong but did Dianne Digette go on record as an "Expert" on guns when she made the new laws in Colorado? If she did, then she purjored herself and that would make the new laws invalid would it not.


If she was not under oath, it is not perjury.  She just "mis-spoke".  
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

BAC

  • Guest
Re: Did Dianne Digette purjor herself as "Expert Witness"?
« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2013, 03:27:16 PM »
If she was not under oath, it is not perjury.  She just "mis-spoke".  

I believe the term they always use is "I was taken out of context."

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Did Dianne Digette purjor herself as "Expert Witness"?
« Reply #3 on: May 28, 2013, 07:02:33 PM »
I believe the term they always use is "I was taken out of context."

That may be the term they use, but the fact is this woman is dumber than a brick.

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8665
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: Did Dianne Digette purjor herself as "Expert Witness"?
« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2013, 07:12:44 PM »
During her 2008 campaign Hillary claimed to have had to run for cover under fire after landing in Iraq for a visit.  New footage showed it was a clam walk with no danger at all..

She was lying to gain a political advantage but it was described as   "she mis-spoke".  


Honestly, if I did something so blatantly dishonorable, I don't think I could come out in the sunlight for some time.

I don't know which I find more disgusting.  Her ability to ignore her own disgraceful behavior or those who also ignored it and support her.

Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: Did Dianne Digette purjor herself as "Expert Witness"?
« Reply #5 on: Today at 04:51:19 PM »

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk