...............
Torture is known for not being a reliable way of gathering intell. People will say/do anything to make it stop.
..........
Tab, I'm allright with your statements. I understand, there are a lot of people who say that data is unreliable and how it's become somewhat of a mantra of the MSM. Someone who has no information may be motivated to say something he thinks will make the process stop, thereby getting unreliable data. I'll go that far with you.
I digress when general statements, like "unreliable information", are foisted on the public as fact to be gobbled up...I question specifically the way that "unreliable information" is used by many...just like the misleading and twisted statements put out by our government to lead us to believe Mexican drug lords were being outfitted by the Wal Mart in El Paso or Corpus Christi.
How much reliable information is gathered....apparently enough to stop a lot of bad things and keep a lot of people alive. Then again, it's coming from government officials. Who do you believe, and that's where discernment comes in. Who is it (in your opinion) that has made misleading, twisted and patently untrue statements in attempts to deceive? Who said they were going to do one thing...and did another...but hey, it's allright they were trying to get elected...we all knew what "he-she-whoever" really meant (
) nudge, nudge, wink, wink.
Whether left or right, lying is lying. The US Government, especially the portion called politician, has been doing that for quite some time and the lies are ramping up. In a past life I worked with people who provided security who came from military intelligence (no, it's not a misnomer), FBI, the NSA etc. So, believe my statement or not, but the people who I worked with were straight shooters so if I err, I do it wisely towards the intelligence community in whom I still have a measure of faith. I remember their chagrin when Clinton, pushing the peace dividend, gutted the intelligence community...as I remember one of them saying in the early 90's after terrorists tried to bomb the WTC and bring it down that an airplane being flown into one of the Twin Towers was a threat...despite the lies of the politicians to the contrary that they were never informed.
I'm good with waterboarding and I don't buy the rather thin arguement that not waterboarding protects our troops. If you have the opinion that no good comes from it, just reflect upon the sources and reliability of the data you used to come up with that opinion. I truly believe that terrorists and fanatics, who don't care about killing civies as a course of terror, are deterred from murdering and torturing troops by us omitting a tool to protect ourselves with. And, I ask, can anyone who believes our troops will be protected in mass from terrorist torture by not waterboarding be truly sane?