Doesn't the .357 have a higher percentage of one shot stops than any other caliber?
.357, .44, .41, .45, .40, .22LR: All I know is I don't want to be on the business end of these little buggers no matter what.....They're all going to hurt!....
Mitch, somewhere in the past someone posted an article written by a Metro Coroner that pretty much confirmed the data. I never researched the validity but knowing the ballistics of the round it made sense. It is true that bullet technology is advancing pretty quickly so in the future, the data may get diluted with other calibers.
It might depend on which years data. 1992, 1996 or 2000. I don't know the ins and outs of the different years but the '92 study has been thrashed - rightly so or not. I'm not into statistics so I can't look at their tables and say "Oh that's not right."We all know placement is King above all other considerations. (well, right behind "Have a gun!)
Mitch, somewhere in the past someone posted an article written by a Metro Coroner that pretty much confirmed the data. I never researched the validity but knowing the ballistics of the round it made sense. It is true that bullet technology is advancing pretty quickly so in the future, the data may get diluted with other calibers.Either way, I carried a .357 snubby in a pants pocket for over a year everywhere I went with no trouble at all. If I was a scrawny little fella that might make a difference.