Author Topic: Rimless 12 guage?  (Read 11586 times)

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6736
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 459
Re: Rimless 12 guage?
« Reply #10 on: December 05, 2012, 08:22:12 PM »
You won't get it to change for 3-Gun. The shotgun market is much too well established. It would be a bigger bust than the 9 MM Federal, or the .45 GAP. The brass itself is much too thin to reliably headspace on. Not only that, but it is not reliable in height now because it doesn't need to be.

It would require an entire new line of ammunition and guns to go along with it. The market would be too limited, and the guns and ammo would be cost prohibitive. Trying to get a new cartridge on the market is a financially risky proposition. Look at the Remington SAUM's, and several of the other short, fat wonder cartridges. Ammo and brass is hard to find, and the guns for them are always heavily discounted because no one wants them.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Rimless 12 guage?
« Reply #11 on: December 05, 2012, 08:51:38 PM »
The thing that we all missed is that the basic assumption of the OP is wrong.
The limiting factor with shot guns isn't magazine capacity, it's the weight of the ammunition.

fightingquaker13

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11894
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Rimless 12 guage?
« Reply #12 on: December 10, 2012, 02:51:22 PM »
The thing that we all missed is that the basic assumption of the OP is wrong.
The limiting factor with shot guns isn't magazine capacity, it's the weight of the ammunition.
Yep! If you could load fifty you'd have to pay someone to carry it. Its why the army went with the M-16. 5.56 isn't the best ammo in the world, but you can sure carry a lot of it, and if one won't do? It's why you have the giggle switch.

Magoo541

  • Bryan Munson
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1566
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Rimless 12 guage?
« Reply #13 on: December 11, 2012, 09:49:11 PM »
The thing that we all missed is that the basic assumption of the OP is wrong.
The limiting factor with shot guns isn't magazine capacity, it's the weight of the ammunition.

My original assumption was, and still is, that a rimless shotgun round would work better in a box magazine (which is easier to reload than a tube magazine).  With a box magazine like those that the Saiga and the Turkish made MKA-1919 but for a rimless shotgun shell the mags would be less of an arc and double stack may be possible (or even a drum).

As for the weight of the ammunition versus capacity that is what I am addressing through reloading with box mags.  Weight on your belt/LBE/back is preferable to a heavy weapon and the more you shoot the lighter it gets  ;D
He who dares wins.  SAS

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Rimless 12 guage?
« Reply #14 on: December 11, 2012, 10:47:37 PM »
They already make a 20 round drum for the Saiga.
The crap about rimmed cartridges not working in semi autos is the product of ignorance.
There are many rimmed cartridge semi auto's using box magazines .
Off the top of my head there are the previously mentioned 12 guages, the .22 LR, the Coonan Arms .357 Magnum 1911, and the Russian SVD sniper rifle that uses the same rimmed 7.62X54 as the Mosin Nagant.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: Rimless 12 guage?
« Reply #15 on: Today at 06:23:15 AM »

fightingquaker13

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11894
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Rimless 12 guage?
« Reply #15 on: December 11, 2012, 11:39:05 PM »
They already make a 20 round drum for the Saiga.
The crap about rimmed cartridges not working in semi autos is the product of ignorance.
There are many rimmed cartridge semi auto's using box magazines .
Off the top of my head there are the previously mentioned 12 guages, the .22 LR, the Coonan Arms .357 Magnum 1911, and the Russian SVD sniper rifle that uses the same rimmed 7.62X54 as the Mosin Nagant.
And lets not forget Desert Eagle. This time its not the need for a new cartridge, just a new shot gun/mag design.An American version of the Saiga. If someone gets it right, I'd expect to see it in a squad car near you. God knows I'd rather see this than a three barreled coach gun. ;D

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6736
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 459
Re: Rimless 12 guage?
« Reply #16 on: December 12, 2012, 06:21:50 AM »
You can't do a direct comparision of feeding of rimmed pistol cartridges from box magazines, to the same from shotgun shells. The magazine tolerances for pistols that shoot rimmed cartridges are held much tighter. The rim of a 12 ga. shell is miniscule in comparision. Factor in the sloppy magazine tolerances from injected molded magazines and drums used in the Saiga, and failures to feed abound. It is far easier for a shot shell to jump the rim and cause a hang up in the process, in a Saiga box magazine or drum, than it would be from a Desert Eagle, Coonan 1911, or a S&W Model 52 .38, all of which fire machined rimmed pistol cartridges.

Another problem with the 12 gauge rim is it is basically the result of an upset stamping process, and not a machining process. The reason is because most all shotguns feed from tubular magazines. The rim is basically used for "head space" and ejection only. It doesn't have to be that precise. If you Google Saiga failures to feed you'll get the phone book. No tubular magazine fed shotgun will produce such poor results unless something is physically broken.  Many who know the weapon claim around a factory 10% feed failure rate. That is totally unacceptable in any type of self defense or competition shotgun. I'm not saying they can't be made to work. Just don't bet your life on one as they come out of the box.

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GUEA_enUS362US362&q=saiga+shotgun+failure+to+feed

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk