Wow,
Thanks for all the replies.
three four ...
1000 pardons. I missed that in the edit.
I hadn't considered the para ordinance, 1911. No reason. I just didn't know anything about it. I guess my original "requirements" included DA/SA and Decocker and "Safe Handling" configuration ... not necessarily a manual safety. I wanted at least a 4" barrel. High capacity isn't a primary concern, but I would rather shoot at the range than re-load magazines.
The Kahr 45 ACP 50 ...
...nice. ...not right now.
It is not my intention to "troll" for an argument of brand. I tried the Glock 22 in 40 S&W. If I wanted 40 S&W vs 45 ACP, I would have that on a short list. The Glock 21 was too big for my hand. Apparently, the new models of G21's modified the grip for 45 acp. In my hands, it was unmanageable. I prefer full size for 45 ACP. I'll come back to this.
S&W M&P was considered. { I am not a fan of the Smith and Wesson company. }
My intentions: Range and Target use is what I am enjoying right now. I may want to compete but can't see it getting to a point where I am looking for a sponsor
. If it does, they can buy me the "next one" ...wink! There is the home defense and CCW aspect. My perceived "risk profile" ( as they say...) is on par with everyone else. I guess I would say "Hobby and Personal Defense" are the best words, right now. I like to shoot rifles and pistols.
Full Sized 45 ACP: I shot and liked the XD 45. I like the basic, "old school" function of the FNP 45. I didn't have the opportunity to shoot the FNP 45 which is the strongest point of my dilemma. I guess it has become a choice of either these two in my current budget.
Thanks for your comments.
~~
4dr