Haz
Once again I have a question. I was watching Anderson Cooper the other night on CNN. He seems as perplexed as I am as to why the companies don't just put trained security on board. He was saying to some insurance guy about the no guns thing, that he bought the argument against personal weapons because of fear of someone going postal or just a yahoo making things worse. But why no trained pro's who could even be left in life boat before the ship hit port? The insurance answer was that a lot of these ships (tankers) emited fumes that could go up if there were sparks. Now this seems sketchy because if the fumes were that bad you'd think the crew would all be dead or blown up by propane burners. I'm not going to argue though, because I know nothing about tankers and am damn sure not volunteering to go on deck and pop a few off to see whether I'm right. Your statement about military support on a fuel tanker, though seems to bear this out. Any thoughts?
FQ13