The Down Range Forum

Member Section => Down Range Cafe => Topic started by: ronlday on December 29, 2009, 07:59:06 PM

Title: why havnt they charged the guy with terrorism
Post by: ronlday on December 29, 2009, 07:59:06 PM
why havnt they charged the "underware bomber", with terrorism?

ron l day
Title: Re: why havnt they charged the guy with terrorism
Post by: CDR on December 29, 2009, 08:01:53 PM


Ssssshhh.....you can't say terrorism..............................remember?
Title: Re: why havnt they charged the guy with terrorism
Post by: tombogan03884 on December 29, 2009, 08:06:41 PM
 Because to Barack HUSSIEN Obama the isn't a terrorist he's a Muslim hero.
The part that surprises me is that the passengers have not been charged with assault or some kind of hate crime for infringing on his right to free expression.
Title: Re: why havnt they charged the guy with terrorism
Post by: twyacht on December 29, 2009, 08:09:40 PM
Well ronlday, welcome to DRTV, even almost 300 counts of attempted murder would have been something to charge him with also, BUT he is now in the custody of the American Justice System. He is now entitled to rights under "OUR" Constitution, even though he is not an American citizen.

Just like the "show" trial coming to NYC, for another group of terrorists, there will be another one for this scumbag crotch burner.

Instead of being charged with terrorism, or being held by the military as an enemy combatant, we have a "progressive" Justice system now, under the direction of AG Eric Holder.

General Wesley Clark, former NATO Allied Commander, said tonight on the O'Reilly Factor, that we should grant these terrorists "civilian" trials, instead of a military tribunal.

Because this poor young man was led astray by "extremists" that we just have to talk to and negotiate with. Than they will leave us alone.

See how stupid that sounds....?????? Welcome to the "Anointed One's" Administration...3 more years to go... :-\

Title: Re: why havnt they charged the guy with terrorism
Post by: bulldog75 on December 29, 2009, 08:12:21 PM
I bet he will claim that his goat did not hug him enough.  :'(
Title: Re: why havnt they charged the guy with terrorism
Post by: sledgemeister on December 30, 2009, 03:41:34 AM
Why even bother with a trial, he tried to blow up a plane full of people. There is no mitigating circumstances, he has links to taliban, he is not by definition insane he knew the ramifications of what he was going to do and was willing to die for it, well let him, die that is. 1 .45 acp placed behind left or right ear and pull trigger. Think of the money saved on housing this retard and cost of trial, appeal, re trial etc etc
Title: Re: why havnt they charged the guy with terrorism
Post by: philw on December 30, 2009, 03:55:53 AM
Why even bother with a trial, he tried to blow up a plane full of people. There is no mitigating circumstances, he has links to taliban, he is not by definition insane he knew the ramifications of what he was going to do and was willing to die for it, well let him, die that is. 1 .45 acp placed behind left or right ear and pull trigger. Think of the money saved on housing this retard and cost of trial, appeal, re trial etc etc



exactly     just like they did in China  with that "Family Man"  that was found with 4kg's  of drugs    got one to the head for that one

no drawn out appeals process, 
Title: Re: why havnt they charged the guy with terrorism
Post by: Pathfinder on December 30, 2009, 05:50:18 AM
I bet he will claim that his goat did not hug him enough.  :'(

Or maybe even a reach around.

Why even bother with a trial, he tried to blow up a plane full of people. There is no mitigating circumstances, he has links to taliban, he is not by definition insane he knew the ramifications of what he was going to do and was willing to die for it, well let him, die that is. 1 .45 acp placed behind left or right ear and pull trigger. Think of the money saved on housing this retard and cost of trial, appeal, re trial etc etc

Naw, too expensive, man!  Have you priced .45ACP lately? I'm from Chicago where the mob's tool of choice was a simple .22LR behind the ear. The bullet just entered and rattled around inside a bit. Very effective. Oh, and feed him a BBQ pulled pork sammich fiirst. Not a mob thing, just a mooslim thing.
Title: Re: why havnt they charged the guy with terrorism
Post by: sledgemeister on December 30, 2009, 07:37:10 AM
Or maybe even a reach around.

Naw, too expensive, man!  Have you priced .45ACP lately? I'm from Chicago where the mob's tool of choice was a simple .22LR behind the ear. The bullet just entered and rattled around inside a bit. Very effective. Oh, and feed him a BBQ pulled pork sammich fiirst. Not a mob thing, just a mooslim thing.

Go one better save the bullet (lead being expensive and all) and just inject him with a mixture of porcine blood, urine and excrement!
Title: Re: why havnt they charged the guy with terrorism
Post by: CDR on December 30, 2009, 08:00:44 AM
For you revisionist historians out there, may I propose a re-enactment of the final moments of Benito Mussolini and and his mistress Clara Petacci.  This time, however, lets make some money for the war effort and make it a world-wide "Pay Per View" event held down at Ground Zero.

Title: Re: why havnt they charged the guy with terrorism
Post by: tt11758 on December 30, 2009, 01:55:57 PM
Because to Barack HUSSIEN Obama the isn't a terrorist he's a Muslim hero.
The part that surprises me is that the passengers have not been charged with assault or some kind of hate crime for infringing on his right to free expression.


The day ain't over.
Title: Re: why havnt they charged the guy with terrorism
Post by: crusader rabbit on December 30, 2009, 02:38:43 PM
TWYACHT said: Because this poor young man was led astray by "extremists" that we just have to talk to and negotiate with. Than they will leave us alone.

We just need to reach out with love.  He needs a caress, just a hugg, :-*
and he'll become a proper member of society instead of trying to kill 300 at a pop.  Meanwhile, those evil SEALS who gave a terrorist (yes, I used the "t" word) a fat lip have to stand a court martial.  >:(
When did we slip into opposite world? ???

Just 3 more years and we can slip back out.  That's hope and change we call all believe in! ;)
Title: Re: why havnt they charged the guy with terrorism
Post by: ericire12 on December 30, 2009, 02:46:38 PM
why havnt they charged the "underware pantie bomber", with terrorism?

ron l day

 ;)
Title: Re: why havnt they charged the guy with terrorism
Post by: twyacht on December 30, 2009, 05:02:01 PM
I recommended to DOJ to let the Navy give them a complimentary cruise....

(http://i296.photobucket.com/albums/mm182/twyacht/untitled.jpg)

They just don't listen to me,....