The Down Range Forum

Member Section => Politics & RKBA => Topic started by: Marshal Halloway on July 08, 2010, 09:30:28 PM

Title: LaPierre & Helmke Debate Post McDonald Gun Rights On PBS
Post by: Marshal Halloway on July 08, 2010, 09:30:28 PM

The recent landmark Supreme Court decision in McDonald v. City of Chicago guarantees that law-abiding American citizens have a fundamental, federal right to own handguns in their homes for self-defense, but the long-term implications are yet to be fully understood. NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre and Paul Helmke of The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence join Gwen Ifill of The PBS NewsHour to discuss the decision, future lawsuits, the labyrinthine DC gun restrictions since the federal ban was lifted, criminal justice and anti-gun Supreme Court Nominee Elena Kagan. Originally aired June 28, 2010.

         
Title: Re: LaPierre & Helmke Debate Post McDonald Gun Rights On PBS
Post by: Sgt Z Squad on July 08, 2010, 11:03:56 PM
November 2010!!
Title: Re: LaPierre & Helmke Debate Post McDonald Gun Rights On PBS
Post by: twyacht on July 10, 2010, 01:36:43 PM
Since Sotomayor stated "Heller is settled law", why did she and the other Lib Justices dissent and vote to maintain the Chicago ban?

I know the answer, it is rhetorical....

Kagan is an Obama clone, she will always have NO support of 2nd Amend/ Firearm related cases brought before SCOTUS in the future.

The confirmation hearings are a farce, and a sham.



Title: Re: LaPierre & Helmke Debate Post McDonald Gun Rights On PBS
Post by: PegLeg45 on July 10, 2010, 03:57:03 PM
Since Sotomayor stated "Heller is settled law", why did she and the other Lib Justices dissent and vote to maintain the Chicago ban?

I know the answer, it is rhetorical....

Kagan is an Obama clone, she will always have NO support of 2nd Amend/ Firearm related cases brought before SCOTUS in the future.

The confirmation hearings are current gubmint is a farce, and a sham.



Sounds closer to the truth......  :(
Title: Re: LaPierre & Helmke Debate Post McDonald Gun Rights On PBS
Post by: tombogan03884 on July 10, 2010, 09:38:39 PM
Since Sotomayor stated "Heller is settled law", why did she and the other Lib Justices dissent and vote to maintain the Chicago ban?

I know the answer, it is rhetorical....

Kagan is an Obama clone, she will always have NO support of 2nd Amend/ Firearm related cases brought before SCOTUS in the future.

The confirmation hearings are a farce, and a sham.

Will you tell me if I get it right ?
Is it because they are scruple lacking hypocrites, who will say and do anything to get their way ?
Is that it ?   
What did I win ?   ;D
Title: Re: LaPierre & Helmke Debate Post McDonald Gun Rights On PBS
Post by: PegLeg45 on July 10, 2010, 10:45:36 PM
What did I win ?   ;D

You get to sit in the newest recliner in the corner.   :D
Title: Re: LaPierre & Helmke Debate Post McDonald Gun Rights On PBS
Post by: tombogan03884 on July 10, 2010, 11:37:46 PM
I'll bring Cheez wizz
Title: Re: LaPierre & Helmke Debate Post McDonald Gun Rights On PBS
Post by: fightingquaker13 on July 10, 2010, 11:46:23 PM
I'll bring Cheez wizz
NO! You'll stain the good chair dude! All the rest are covered in cheeze whizz and Cheetos crumbs. The good one is reserved for things like ham and cheese and crackers that won't stain. Its leather you know!  ;D
FQ13