The Down Range Forum

Member Section => Handguns => Topic started by: Gunmart on January 17, 2011, 08:30:46 AM

Title: New subcompact 9 - Kimber Solo
Post by: Gunmart on January 17, 2011, 08:30:46 AM
Full run down with pics and vids here:

http://gunmart.blogspot.com/2011/01/kimber-solo.html
Title: Re: New subcompact 9 - Kimber Solo
Post by: fightingquaker13 on January 17, 2011, 08:42:31 AM
Full run down with pics and vids here:

http://gunmart.blogspot.com/2011/01/kimber-solo.html
How does it compare width or size wise to say an LCP or G-26? It seems smaller than the new Ruger (though pricier). Just curious.
FQ13
Title: Re: New subcompact 9 - Kimber Solo
Post by: Gunmart on January 17, 2011, 08:48:54 AM
How does it compare width or size wise to say an LCP or G-26? It seems smaller than the new Ruger (though pricier). Just curious.
FQ13

There is a picture of it with the LCP on that blog post
Title: Re: New subcompact 9 - Kimber Solo
Post by: fightingquaker13 on January 17, 2011, 08:51:36 AM
There is a picture of it with the LCP on that blog post
And so there is. :-[ ;D
FQ13
Title: Re: New subcompact 9 - Kimber Solo
Post by: bafsu92 on January 17, 2011, 09:26:26 AM
Here's how it compares to my Walther PPS which I think is a great pistol and some other smaller models

                   Walther PPS            Kimber Solo         Taurus 709 Slim       Ruger LC9
Length OA           6.3"                     5.5"                         6"                      6"
Weight E           20.8 oz                 17 oz                      19 oz                 17 oz
Height                4.4"                     3.9"                        4.6"                   4.5"
Width                 1.04"                   1.2"                        1.1"                   .90"
Capacity                6                        6                            7                       7

I know my Walther is reliable as it gets and I like not having any external safeties it makes it feel even thinner than it really is. I'd have to hold both the Kimber and LC9 to see how they really compare. I've held and shot a 709 slim and didn't care for it. It was actually less comfortable to grip than my Taurus PT145 which is more than easy enough for me to conceal in just about any situation. I keep the Walther for deeper concealment but mainly for times when I'm restricted by work rules or state laws to a 9mm or .38spl.
Title: Re: New subcompact 9 - Kimber Solo
Post by: Solus on January 17, 2011, 09:28:30 AM
There is a video comparison of it with the LCP here.

http://www.kimber1911pistols.com/tag/kimber-solo-carry/


Now this looks interesting.  It is very close in size to the LCP.  maybe half an inch longer and half an inch taller and a quarter inch wider.

Weight is 17 ounces empty which is about half a pound heaver than the LCP.  Two sticks of butter heaver, if you want to have an easy gauge.

Title: Re: New subcompact 9 - Kimber Solo
Post by: BAC on January 17, 2011, 09:42:37 AM
The shop I was at on Saturday had one in the display case.  It looks really well built.  And tiny.
Title: Re: New subcompact 9 - Kimber Solo
Post by: Bic on January 17, 2011, 09:53:32 AM
That has certainly peaked my interest, nice looking pistol!. I have an LCP and a PPS40..................but  8).

I'd like to handle one and compare it to the new Sig compact 9 - are they available yet?



MP
Title: Re: New subcompact 9 - Kimber Solo
Post by: seeker_two on January 17, 2011, 10:05:23 AM

Yes, Michael Bane was right


Of course he's right....a guy with that good a taste in hats can't be wrong....  8)

I'd rather have seen Kimber do a EMP-style 9mm for half the price of the Springfield....but this is pretty nice.....

Wonder how long until Glock and S&W jump on the bandwagon?.....
Title: Re: New subcompact 9 - Kimber Solo
Post by: fightingquaker13 on January 17, 2011, 10:14:19 AM
nice.....

Wonder how long until Glock and S&W jump on the bandwagon?.....
From your mouth to God's ear. ;) The only down side to this is the price. I can buy two Rugers for that. The trouble with Kimber is that they are a little too pretty for their own good in this market.I love their aesthetics in 19911s. They are drool worthy, and I say say that as a Glock guy. But, a pocket pistol is going to be kept, well, in your pocket. Quick and dirty is the game here. If they could drop that to the $500-$550 range, I'd look hard at it.
FQ13
Title: Re: New subcompact 9 - Kimber Solo
Post by: WatchManUSA on January 17, 2011, 02:07:49 PM
The Solo is the same size as the Sig P238 or the Colt Mustang but in full 9mm.  The Sig P290 is a plastic lower frame like the P250 line or the new releas of the P2022.
Title: Re: New subcompact 9 - Kimber Solo
Post by: WatchManUSA on January 17, 2011, 03:55:38 PM
I got a lead on the suggested retail on the Kimber Solo's:

"The all-new Solo™ Carry and Solo™ Carry Stainless are the most accurate, shootable and dependable 9mm microcompacts ever off ered.  Suggested retail price $725."
Title: Re: New subcompact 9 - Kimber Solo
Post by: r_w on January 17, 2011, 04:45:05 PM
is that 1.2" thick number right?  That is chunky, GLOCK chunky.
Title: Re: New subcompact 9 - Kimber Solo
Post by: Ichiban on January 17, 2011, 04:55:02 PM
is that 1.2" thick number right?  That is chunky, GLOCK chunky.

That has to be measured across the ambi-safeties. 
Title: Re: New subcompact 9 - Kimber Solo
Post by: bafsu92 on January 17, 2011, 05:50:20 PM
From your mouth to God's ear. ;) The only down side to this is the price. I can buy two Rugers for that. The trouble with Kimber is that they are a little too pretty for their own good in this market.I love their aesthetics in 19911s. They are drool worthy, and I say say that as a Glock guy. But, a pocket pistol is going to be kept, well, in your pocket. Quick and dirty is the game here. If they could drop that to the $500-$550 range, I'd look hard at it.
FQ13
Give it a while for the hype to die and street price will be about $550. It will be just like every hot new gun, demand will far exceed supply for a while then things will even out and people will want to move them like they were before. I remember when I first wanted an LCP and people were paying $500+ for them at a show. I just picked up another barely used one the other day for $200.