The Down Range Forum
Member Section => Politics & RKBA => Topic started by: Rastus on March 03, 2009, 09:47:27 PM
-
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=83837 (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=83837)
Could it be there is no push for gun control because....the nation is only two votes away from calling a Constitutional Convention? Ohio is considering calling for it...which would be state number 33 calling for a Constitutional Convention. One more state, then the Congress has no choice it must call a Constitutional Convention. The apointees/delegates to it (unelected) would be more powerful than the Congress.
We could have a new constitution. No Bill of Rights, certainly no 2nd Amendment and I'm certain only accepted free speech...no hate speech as defined by the thieves and corrupt politicians who would attend a modern Constitutional Convention.
Word on the street is that state number thirty-four is only two years away.
While we've been focusing on current framework...the insidious thing is that the current constitution can go away rather quickly leaving us empty handed.
Can you imagine what type of constitution we would have that sprouts from the twisted and perverted minds of the likes of Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, BHO, et. al.
And no, I'm not sleeping well tonight after learning of this consideration.
-
THAT would be a clear call to start killing politicians.
-
TO ARMS! TO ARMS! >:(
-
Oh......my..... :-X
I'm finding it increasingly harder to keep down the bowl of fruit-loops I was just eating.
-
It wouldn't be so bad if they let ME write it :
Article 1
Clause 1 This is a Judeo/Christian culture, We will allow you to practice any religion that does not advocate the slaughter of all who disagree with you, if you don't like OUR culture that's just to bad.
Clause 2 Public speakers and news media are free to say anything they can prove. There is no such thing as freedom of expression, Destroying or defacing national icons or emblems is punishable by death.
Clause 3 Citizens have the right to peaceably assemble, and to petition for redress of legitimate grievances.
Amendment 2,
Clause 1 Because the servants of the people some times need to be beaten for their despicable conduct and inflated self opinion, All citizens will own as many of whatever types of fire arms as they may desire.
Clause 2 Any attempt by local, State or Federal officials to regulate the possession or ownership of arms (meaning any type of weapon Not including weapons of mass destruction) or ammunition (meaning anything needed to make them function ) shall constitute prima facia evidence of treason. Those who propose such regulation shall be instantly removed from office and held in a mental health facility pending their sentence of death.
What do you think ?
-
What do you think ?
Too mamby-pampy. Can't you come up with something stronger? ;)
Oh an add, the ONLY official language is "English".
-
Illegals will be thrown in jail without redress until we brand them and ship them home. Repeat offenders will be shot on sight.
The government is in effect to provide for the common defense, provide infrastructure, etc. ALL government funded social welfare programs (domestic and foreign) are illegal.
Flat tax.
Term limits.
Campaign limits that are meaningful enough that anyone can run for election.
-
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!!!
-
I think I'll have to go to work on my blog and expand on this.
Haz, and Alf, It's only an example, I've thought out some other stuff as well. ;D
-
It's not so much that we need a NEW Constitution.........it's just that the ORIGINAL needs about 200 years of added BullSh*t trimmed off of it to get it back in shape again.
8)
-
18 and 21 should go away and renumber the rest.
-
It's not so much that we need a NEW Constitution.........it's just that the ORIGINAL needs about 200 years of added BullSh*t trimmed off of it to get it back in shape again.
8)
We need to trim about anything that happened after 1900 off.
-
We need to trim about anything that happened after 1900 off.
That's from 16 on. The first amendment ratified in the 20th century was the income tax.
-
It's not so much that we need a NEW Constitution.........it's just that the ORIGINAL needs about 200 years of added BullSh*t trimmed off of it to get it back in shape again.
8)
AMEN to that!
If you read the original Bill of Rights, and then read the remaining amendments, look at how the language changed. From 11 to 26, you can't understand them at times. I say that all amendments be written in layman's terms so the average joe can understand it.
-
AMEN to that!
If you read the original Bill of Rights, and then read the remaining amendments, look at how the language changed. From 11 to 26, you can't understand them at times. I say that all amendments be written in layman's terms so the average joe can understand it.
Couple of problems with being written in layman's terms...one is you can't be deceived by judges who think laws are not absolute but that a law's meaning and content must change with the times (should reflect the current society's values). A turning point of which occurred with Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in the Supreme Court who, if not first, most loudly espoused that belief. My understanding is that Holmes is the turning point when the guidance of Blackstone (absolute interpretations based on actual meanings) began to be phased out.
The other problem with that....let me think about that one.
-
Couple of problems with being written in layman's terms...one is you can't be deceived by judges who think laws are not absolute but that a law's meaning and content must change with the times (should reflect the current society's values). A turning point of which occurred with Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in the Supreme Court who, if not first, most loudly espoused that belief. My understanding is that Holmes is the turning point when the guidance of Blackstone (absolute interpretations based on actual meanings) began to be phased out.
The other problem with that....let me think about that one.
Did you know that Oliver Wendall Holmes was a proponent of the same euthanasia laws that Hitler implemented ?
-
Did you know that Oliver Wendall Holmes was a proponent of the same euthanasia laws that Hitler implemented ?
I'm not surprised...he was a humanist. Like Woodrow Wilson.