Low recoil, and high capacity, both of these are good things. High dollar gun, boutique caliber, limited choices of ammo, (relatively) expensive to practice with, and not much selection of good SD rounds? These are the down sides. I agree that a weapon broadly adopted by LEOs and the military sets my my baseline for realibilty in a pinch. They have a lot of money for performance tests and will (hopefully) sh!tcan any weapon that doen't work. I guess I look at it like any other civilian app for a military weapon. Will it work for what I want to do with it? In this case the answer is no. The P-90 assault carbine, the platform the cartridge was built around, is designed to provide accurate, high volume, low recoil fire from a full auto carbine against an armored target. That doesn't check any boxes in my "what do I think I might ask this gun to do" list. They wanted a companion pistol (an afterthought, that would use the same ammo). Fair enough. But..... Even if I did kick in doors for a living with a P-90 or went through the Stargate to PX whatever to fight the Goua'ld, I'd still rather have a .45 on my hip.

I just see this as a small round that goes really fast and makes a small hole with a lot of penetration. Add to this that neither the gun nor ammo are cheap. Me, barring specific circumstances that made low recoil key, would buy a 9mm, .40, .45 or .357 from any of the usual suspects. Just my .02.
FQ13