Author Topic: House voted to rename the Department of the Navy  (Read 1087 times)

ericire12

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7926
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
House voted to rename the Department of the Navy
« on: May 04, 2010, 09:45:12 PM »
http://congress.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/05/04/house-votes-to-change-the-name-of-the-%e2%80%9cdepartment-of-the-navy%e2%80%9d/?test=latestnews
Quote
The House voted Tuesday to rename the Department of the Navy and call it the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps.

After all, supporters of the measure point out that in Marines’ Hymn, the lyrics indicate that Marines “fight our country’s battles in the air, on land and sea.”

Which is where the Department of the Navy comes in.

Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., is one of the main authors of the proposed change. He represents Camp Jejune, a key Marine base situated along the North Carolina shoreline. The Marines have long been tucked inside the Department of the Navy. But Jones says this change just recognizes the Marines on an equal footing with the Marines.

The House has approved similar bills for the past eight years. But it’s never made it through the Senate.
Everything I needed to learn in life I learned from Country Music.

fightingquaker13

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11894
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: House voted to rename the Department of the Navy
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2010, 10:21:23 PM »
As dumb as this sounds, its actually serious business. The Marines have always been the redheaded step child of the US military when it comes to budgets, equipment, etc. Yet, particularly now, they are, after SOCOM, the Rangers and MAYBE the 82nd, the best suited to deal with the current threat. Do we make them a Co-equal 5th branch, thus getting them a bigger budget, make them officially co-equal to the navy, acknowledging that the days of them leading shore partys and preventing mutinees are long passed or what? I think a case could be made for transferring them to JSOC, or making them their own branch, or  making them the co-equal of the Navy with the squids put on notice not to screw with this. Me, I'm not so much waiting for the Army Navy game, as the intra-mural scrimage between Marines and Sailors at Annapolis. Hell, the idea of a Marine Service Academy? Parris Island with a BA, I would pay good money to watch. ;D
FQ13 

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: House voted to rename the Department of the Navy
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2010, 03:06:21 AM »
The Marines have been a Co Equal branch in fact if not in Name  having their own budget and a seat on the Joint Chiefs.
Personally I would like to see Dept of the Marine Corps, and their ride     ;D
But from a historical stand point it recognizes the Origins of Navy and Corps both as the projection of American power overseas, the line in the Hymn refers to Marine sharp shooters fighting aboard ships at sea by sniping the enemies officers and gun crews.
At the same time adding the Marines to the name recognizes the growth of the Corps strength and importance, and the shoreward shift in military focus.

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: House voted to rename the Department of the Navy
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2010, 07:12:20 AM »
Seems like a good first step.

Anyone who was only aware of the "Spirit" and core of the Corps would be surprised to find they were not an independant branch.

Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk