The " Ability to Carry" debate on National Parks ramped up today with this report.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gOFasRWiJ7-T9PbxUQ2Nmv4YypcgD92H1EN81The father fought the bear off twice,.. bare-handed,.... wouldn't carrying a "something" with 5 to 15 shots be helpful?
The Game Wardens killed this bear anyway. an 86 pound young male,...My question is,.. what if it was 186 pounds?
Than there would be TWO fatalities. This applies to the "Camping Gun" thread, "Out for the weekend, in the woods, scenario,."
I have a 13 year old son, who eats all day and still grows like a weed,..(kinda on the slim side some would say skinny),.
I would have at least pulled out my Kershaw pocket knife, and been "goin at it" as they say,.. if it was my son, or anyone else in my direct presence. Bottom line,. they were lucky.
Being able to carry even my P3AT with Gold-Dots, technically "legally", would be something.

Sure a .44 or S&W .500 would be ideal, but in my reality, just being able to carry on National Park land, (ours as Americans anyway?) would just seem right.,...