Gun control humiliated again.

[ericire12]

http://www.examiner.com/x-2323-LA-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2009m4d5-Gun-control-humiliated-again

With every single criminal shooting, gun control is shown to have been a failure; an absolutely, abject, humiliating failure.

I could begin by showing how every nation banning guns also saw its own share of increasing violence first, then the call for banning guns. Where there is violence, only the gun crimes are covered by the media, only the gun crimes are the most spectacular, one might think, but dying is dying; not all crimes of violence are guns – many are knifings, rapes, robberies, chokings, beatings, poisonings, abductions — each of which can be stopped by a the lethal force of a loaded gun in the hands of a citizen. This makes the anti-crime argument for taking guns a outright fraud.

As you might imagine, gun rights activists such as those of us here at Examiner understand that if one person — only one person — were armed at the time of Wong’s shooting rage in Binghamton or at nearly any other mass shootings, the incident would have turned out much, much better. Wouldn’t it? Yes, it would have. It certainly did for some churches with armed worshipers among the congregation, didn’t it? They don’t have to sold on the stupidity of gun control and the wisdom of the armed citizen.

Better yet, if it were generally known that the armed citizen were common, in fact ubiquitous, perhaps there wouldn’t even be as many attempts, would there? No, there wouldn’t. More Americans are getting it.

Finally, of course, there is the fact permeating all of these so-called lone gunman shootings, and that is that the shooters were prohibited persons to begin with. It is here that gun control for all and regulation are a humiliating failure as an anti-crime measure, and even holds the coat for murderers who obtain a gun in spite of it’s being illegal for them. Gun control holds the coat for murderers by the fact that gun control bans weapons in advance of the murderer’s arrival at wherever he’s going to shoot and kill. We call these places Victim Disarmament Zones, areas demarcated off in advance as being entirely unarmed and known for it. This holds the coat of the very next killers to come unchallenged. Does that make sense to you? Does it make sense to you to disarm parents who might visit who might be free to act in defending another’s child?

All anti-gun nuts can see is the gun. They cannot see themselves coming to the aid of another, they just can’t see it. They cannot see themselves having enough.. shall we say, worth, in For, when they seek to disarm others, they work to disarm themselves, and to surrender up a lot more than gun rights. For them, life is intimidating.

Anti-gun activists don’t realize what they are doing to themselves along with other Americans. The anti-gun nuts cannot even see that the shooters are persons for whom guns are already banned. Doesn’t work, does it? It is the prohibited persons who are troubled persons to begin with. It is the felons who are prohibited from even possessing a gun who are doing the shootings. So much for profiling shooters. So much for gun control. What an idiotic concept to disarm the citizens and oneself, and be unable to disarm the prohibited persons. Being unarmed is the perfect excuse not to defend your wife and kids, isn’t it?

Please, tell me: how in the name of Liberty will gun control ever reach the prohibited persons who come to kill our friends and neighbors?

It won’t because that’s not the plan. It never was.

[mudman]

Gun control is a decoy to steal our LIBERTY.

[tombogan03884]

I have a Gun Control plan that is guaranteed to lower crime rates and lessen the death toll in mass shooting incidents. (They can not be prevented entirely as crazy people abound. )
 1) Every law abiding, non prohibited person must own and CARRY a fire arm at all times. People with religious scruples against violence can substitute a first aid kit for the firearm and replace firearms training with Red Cross Medical training.
2) Make "gun free zones" illegal.
3) Imprison any and all anti 2A activists and politicians for conspiracy to commit murder, rape, and robbery.

[ericire12]

I have a Gun Control plan that is guaranteed to lower crime rates and lessen the death toll in mass shooting incidents. (They can not be prevented entirely as crazy people abound. )
 1) Every law abiding, non prohibited person must own and CARRY a fire arm at all times. People with religious scruples against violence can substitute a first aid kit for the firearm and replace firearms training with Red Cross Medical training.
2) Make "gun free zones" illegal.
3) Imprison any and all anti 2A activists and politicians for conspiracy to commit murder, rape, and robbery.

Yep.... Thats how it used to work. Colt came up with this idea long ago, however. Why do you think they named their SAA the "Peacemaker"?

Exit Question: Could you imagine the outrage if a handgun company came out with a gun now days called the "Peacemaker"? That Brady Chick's head would probably explode! The Glock Peacemaker anyone? 

http://www.downrange.tv/forum/index.php/topic,1936.0.html

OR



*BTW I think I might have to end up naming my P32 the "Liberator"

[Sgt Z Squad]

Make "gun free zones" illegal.

We should be calling these zones what they really are. "Free Murder Zones."

[Sponsor]

[Dakotaranger]

Yep.... Thats how it used to work. Colt came up with this idea long ago, however. Why do you think they named their SAA the "Peacemaker"?

Exit Question: Could you imagine the outrage if a handgun company came out with a gun now days called the "Peacemaker"? That Brady Chick's head would probably explode! The Glock Peacemaker anyone?  Glock Peacemaker!?  that's should be considered treason

http://www.downrange.tv/forum/index.php/topic,1936.0.html

OR



*BTW I think I might have to end up naming my P32 the "Liberator"