"The main argument seems to be that Congressional oversight over the Fed is government interference in the free market," he wrote. "This argument shows a misunderstanding of what a free market really is. Fundamentally, you cannot defend the Federal Reserve and the free market at the same time
"The Fed negates the very foundation of a free market by artificially manipulating the price and supply of money – the lifeblood of the economy. In a free market, interest rates, like the price of any other consumer good, are decentralized and set by the market. The only legitimate, Constitutional role of government in monetary policy is to protect the integrity of the monetary unit and defend against counterfeiters," he said.
What has actually happened is the U.S. is that Congress "has abdicated this responsibility to a cabal of elite, quasi-governmental banks who, instead of stabilizing the economy, have destabilized it," he wrote.
Paul said it took "less than two decades for the Federal Reserve to bring on the Great Depression of the 1930s."
He also said some have been worried about bringing the Fed into the "political process."
"The Federal Reserve is already heavily entrenched in the political process, as the Fed chairman is a political appointee. High level officials routinely make the rounds between positions at the Fed, member banks, Treasury and back again, taking care of friends and each other along the way," he said.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=98782