Poll

In which order would you prefer to carry guns from these three firearms makers?

KelTec, Diamondback, Taurus?
4 (10.3%)
Taurus, KelTec, Diamondback?
10 (25.6%)
Diamondback, Taurus, KelTec?
2 (5.1%)
KelTec, Taurus, Diamondback
20 (51.3%)
Taurus, Diamondback, KelTec
3 (7.7%)
Diamondback, KelTec, Taurus
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 37


Author Topic: Which would you carry?  (Read 5047 times)

GUNS-R-US

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 748
  • We must protect & defend our freedoms!
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Which would you carry?
« on: July 12, 2010, 06:52:14 PM »
Okay so Eric had a tread going on some little plastic pistols and the question came of these three makers who's gun would you prefer to carry? Considering things like price, reliability, fit and finish, looks, and what ever else you can think of! As a pocket pistol lover I'm very interested to see the results.



Here's the original thread:
http://www.downrange.tv/forum/index.php?topic=5972.0
Mike Kramer
NRA "Benefactor" Life Member 
2AF Life Member

jnevis

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1479
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Which would you carry?
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2010, 07:30:50 PM »
Only because I haven't actually shot the Diamondback
When seconds mean the difference between life and death, the police will be minutes away.

You are either SOLVING the problem, or you ARE the problem.

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7722
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 620
Re: Which would you carry?
« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2010, 08:02:56 PM »
I think this spawned off my question and upcoming purchase.

I've decided to go with the crowd....Kel-Tec  (pending one last inspection and handling of the gun at time of purchase)

Too many times I've tried to be an innovation leader and not been please.   And while the DB might turn out to be great, it's too new, and I want to know parts and service will be here for a while.     

Taurus does give out the extra mag and the nifty case, but heck, I'll just conform and be happy.  Too many other fish to fry right now to really worry about it.   If I had the money, I'd buy all three!  Put 500 rounds through each (talk about money?) and then keep the best of the lot.
Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW 1968-1972

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Which would you carry?
« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2010, 01:39:11 AM »
Taurus and Diamond back are new product, Buyer beware .
 Kel Tec is proven.

Rob10ring

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1024
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Which would you carry?
« Reply #4 on: July 13, 2010, 05:36:11 AM »
Kahr/Ruger/KelTec ;) …mostly because the Kahr is the only one legal for sale in my state.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: Which would you carry?
« Reply #5 on: Today at 09:33:00 AM »

Hazcat

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10457
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Which would you carry?
« Reply #5 on: July 13, 2010, 08:14:47 AM »

KelTec/Taurus/Diamond back

I have a P3AT and it works just fine.  Eats what I feed it, shoots to point of aim and has never even hiccuped!
All tipoes and misspelings are copi-righted.  Pleeze do not reuse without ritten persimmons  :D

shooter32

  • shooter32
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2945
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 41
Re: Which would you carry?
« Reply #6 on: July 13, 2010, 09:46:42 AM »
KelTec/Taurus/Diamond back
A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have. ~ Gerald Ford - August 12, 1974

twyacht

  • "Cogito, ergo armatum sum."
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10419
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Which would you carry?
« Reply #7 on: July 14, 2010, 05:23:45 PM »
Also a P3AT owner for two years, after a fluff & buff and break in, NO issues. Like Haz posted, eats all ammo.

Also a Taurus M85 Ultra-Lite Snub owner since Christmas, .38 and +P rated, NO issues.

Friend Rob owns a Diamondback, I have never shot it, but he is pretty gun savvy and seems pleased with it.

Thomas Jefferson: The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government. That is why our masters in Washington are so anxious to disarm us. They are not afraid of criminals. They are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants."
Col. Jeff Cooper.

rich642z

  • Active Forum Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 62
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Which would you carry?
« Reply #8 on: July 14, 2010, 11:54:06 PM »
I carry 2 revolvers. Rugers Sp101 in .357 2.25 inch Barrel,and the NEW RUGER LCR ALSO IN .357 MAGNUM.   Comparing recoil of both,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,  SWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET.   rich642z  I do not like Autos.  I have 3 Glocks in 9mm for sale and I am from the OLD SCHOOL AND DISABLED.

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7722
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 620
Re: Which would you carry?
« Reply #9 on: July 30, 2010, 07:42:00 PM »
To sum it up:   I ended up with the Taurus.  DiamondBack, the company, is too new to invest in right now.  Taurus had some things going for it, such as the extra mag and the pouch.   That and the recommendation of the gun store owner who selected the Taurus as a BU.

As I said on the other post, for those who missed it.  Once I broke it in with several mags of  FMJs (no failures) then it fired several mags of defensive HP ammo no hitch either.

One thing to get done very soon is to paint the sights.   I'll have to check my paint selection.

The other thing I might like to replace is the magazine release button spring.  I think that  spring could be a little heaver to my taste.   I don't anticipate a "quick" mag change and I don't want to risk it dropping out.  Nice that these little guns do NOT have a mag disconnect.   

Thanks for all the input everyone.   
Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW 1968-1972

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk