That has no bearing, This has nothing to do with either religion, or 1st Amendment, (which by the way has never been held to protect lying for gain.This is a simple case of falsely claiming things that are not true .And why shouldn't candidates claims be fact checked ?
Actually Tom, that's the problem. Lying for gain is perfectlly Constitutional. Its lying for gain at someone else's expense that is criminal. There has to be fraud or libel/slander with an identfiable, discreet victim. Here, we have to find a victim. I don't see one other than the voters. Yet, if we allow this, than someone has to be "fact checker' for all elections. They would all end up in court. I loathe and despise this guy. I just don't see a way to Constitutionally stop politicians from lying (substitute breathing). I mean hell, the Constitution itself exmpts Congress critters from being held to account for anything they say under the "free speech and debate" clause of article I. FQ13