When you look at guns with aggressive texturing on the grip surface you need to consider how you are going to carry the gun. The guns with aggressive textures can wreak havoc on clothes and exposed skin that continuously rubs against the surfaces. Glock learned their lesson with the RTF grip surface and changed it with the Gen4. People make the same comments regarding the H&K P30 and now the "E" series Sigs.
+1
I'm not understanding the need for all of these sandpaper like abrasive textures we're now seeing on handguns? People 25 years ago had no trouble holding on to .44 Magnum Super Blackhawks, or hot loaded Smith & Wesson 29's with beautiful, smooth wooden grips. Now their heading to the abrasive isle of Home Depot to wrap their 9 MM's in the latest Carborundum Norton has to offer. I can see the new Overmolded Hogue style because it's not abrasive, yet provides a nice gripping surface, but some of these "solutions" look like something you would use to refinish a family room floor! And then of course, right away the industry gets into a "can you top this" contest over it.
I can't imagine some of these abrasive style grips rubbing against a nice shirt, or worse bare skin. Not to mention they would hang up on clothing like trying to sweep steel wool off a carpet. It used to be if you wanted a little better surface for gripping a handgun you went to checkered grips. It provided you with a better surface, plus good looks. Now it's gone off the chart. People are too quick to adapt what some of these competitors use on the range in competition, to everyday carry. A lot of this stuff doesn't cross over very well. It's one thing to play with a gun on the range for half an hour, and another to carry one 9 hours a day on your person. Top Fuel dragsters are fun to watch, but they wouldn't be much good at getting you to work. Bill T.