If you're looking for the "why's" of the war, read Taney's majority opinion in Scott v. Sanford. Its 76 pages of the worst example of judicial activism (and bad history) in the history of the Court. Basically, in an attempt to make the slavery issue go away, Taney made the war inevitable by effectively nationalizing slavery. No longer could it be dealt ith by political means (states making their own laws, squatter soveriegnty, or Congressional action), it was now a Constitutional right protected by the 5A. What he didn't get was that this scared the crap out of the Northern white working class. Consider it outsourcing in the extreme. Northern blue collar whites never really cared for African Americans (they still don't). However, Dredd Scott made it legal to essentially buy a bunch of slaves in Virginia, bring them to New York and put them to work in a factory. This did not go over well, and led to Lincoln's election. Its not a story told in the history books as much as it should be, but the war was as much about class politics as it was race or tarrifs or any of the rest of it. I'll post more if you want, but Taney (and the other 7 cononcurring and dissenting opinions

) in that particular fiasco are worth a read. Good luck with the project.
FQ13