Author Topic: 5.56 NATO vs. .223  (Read 20925 times)

justbill

  • Very Active Forum Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 142
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: 5.56 NATO vs. .223
« Reply #10 on: March 03, 2008, 03:36:31 PM »
I'm in complete agreement. My RRA Entry Tactical is also chambered for 5.56mm. I just wish I had the option for a slower than 1-in-9" twist from the manufacturer.



DonWorsham

  • MWAG
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 795
  • I feel more like I do now than I ever did
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: 5.56 NATO vs. .223
« Reply #11 on: March 03, 2008, 04:41:41 PM »
Mine is 1/7 twist.
Don Worsham
Varied Movements Performed Intensely

wisconsin

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 316
  • NRA member
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: 5.56 NATO vs. .223
« Reply #12 on: March 03, 2008, 04:53:26 PM »
Its a good think I'm on this forum, because just when I think I've got a handle on this issue. I begin to relize I really don't know squat about choosing a caliber/proper rate of twist for the AR I want. Keep up the info, its much appreciate.
" I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them."   John Wayne

TexGun

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: 5.56 NATO vs. .223
« Reply #13 on: March 03, 2008, 07:35:04 PM »
Well, i guess that clears it up for me.  Guess i'm going for 5.56 so I can run either. 

justbill

  • Very Active Forum Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 142
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: 5.56 NATO vs. .223
« Reply #14 on: March 03, 2008, 08:56:47 PM »
Its a good think I'm on this forum, because just when I think I've got a handle on this issue. I begin to relize I really don't know squat about choosing a caliber/proper rate of twist for the AR I want. Keep up the info, its much appreciate.

As a rule of thumb and assuming 5.56 NATO/.223 Remington, a 1-in-9" twist will be fine if the majority of loads you use are 62-grains or less. If you want to go heavier in bullet weight, you'll want a slower twist like Don's 1-in-7" barrel. This is also the same twist used in the current generation of M16's and M4's. (The military first went to 1-in-7 to stabilize the tracer cartridge using a rather long bullet. It also works great for the 75- and 77-grain BTHP loads that exhibit excellent long-range accuracy. Specialized military troops using these loads in Afghanistan and Iraq also report enhanced lethality compared to standard M855 Ball.)

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: 5.56 NATO vs. .223
« Reply #15 on: Today at 06:33:55 PM »

Bill Stryker

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 727
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: 5.56 NATO vs. .223
« Reply #15 on: March 04, 2008, 07:39:12 AM »
My RRA has a 1 in 8 twist. They make them in several flavors. If you want a slower twist just tell them when you place the order.

justbill

  • Very Active Forum Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 142
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: 5.56 NATO vs. .223
« Reply #16 on: March 04, 2008, 06:30:01 PM »
When I purchased my M4gery they only offered 1-in-9. You can now get a 1-in-7 with the carbines, 1-in-8 Wylde-chambered barrels in rifles.

TexGun

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: 5.56 NATO vs. .223
« Reply #17 on: March 04, 2008, 09:28:48 PM »
Based on all of this good feedback and the way the way my fellow Texans are turning out for the democrats, i'm placing my order tomorrow!!!

justbill

  • Very Active Forum Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 142
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: 5.56 NATO vs. .223
« Reply #18 on: March 05, 2008, 05:05:58 AM »
That's not a bad idea at all. I foresee some truly dark days ahead as gun owners if either Clinton or Obama is elected. (Not that McCain is a 2nd Amendment stalwart but he'd certainly be the runaway favorite solely based on gun issues.) Funds don't allow me to purchase another fully assembled AR right now but I will be getting a stripped lower receiver or two as a "just in case" hedge against any early attempts to ban EBR's.

BTW, may I ask which specific AR models you're considering?

TexGun

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: 5.56 NATO vs. .223
« Reply #19 on: March 05, 2008, 10:02:05 AM »
I'm really not sure right now.  Based on some feedback from some other friends I'm leaning towards a Busmaster or S&W(Stag).  Any advice on specific models?  My big requirements are, adjustable stock and removeable carry handle.  I'm a little old school, so I'm not really looking at any with the carbon fiber receivers.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk