Author Topic: Guns for ME but NOT for THEE (CA politicians)  (Read 4249 times)

Hazcat

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10457
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Guns for ME but NOT for THEE (CA politicians)
« on: March 14, 2011, 10:31:59 AM »
Some California lawmakers want easier access to carry concealed guns

They say their job has become dangerous, citing the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson and threats from constituents. Baca objects to singling out elected officials.

By Patrick McGreevy, Los Angeles Times

March 14, 2011


The right to carry a concealed weapon in California is mostly reserved for those at risk of violence — jewelers, bail bondsmen and criminal prosecutors among them.

But some legislators say their job has become dangerous too. Despite objections from some law enforcement officials and even gun rights advocates, they want a law that would make it easier for them to tote firearms for protection.

The lawmakers cite the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) in Tucson and threats from constituents in California as cause for permits to carry weapons.

--SNIP--

Under the new bill, being an elected state official or a member of Congress would constitute good cause. The officials would, like others, be subject to a background check, and a sheriff or police chief could still turn down the application, Wright noted.

--SNP--

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-guns-20110314,0,4773477.story

more and comments at link
All tipoes and misspelings are copi-righted.  Pleeze do not reuse without ritten persimmons  :D

BAC

  • Guest
Re: Guns for ME but NOT for THEE (CA politicians)
« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2011, 11:24:04 AM »
How dare you challenge the ruling class!  Don't you know they're better than the rest of us?

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Guns for ME but NOT for THEE (CA politicians)
« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2011, 11:38:35 AM »
What "decent politician" ( Oxymoron I know,) needs to carry a concealed hand gun ? Don't they hire people for that ?

MikeBjerum

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11007
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1175
Re: Guns for ME but NOT for THEE (CA politicians)
« Reply #3 on: March 14, 2011, 12:25:14 PM »
I need to do some research, but my daily reading of the newspapers tells me that it is the citizens and not the rulers that are being assaulted every day.

I may be wrong, but I think I will research that one.
If I appear taller than other men it is because I am standing on the shoulders of others.

r_w

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 947
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Guns for ME but NOT for THEE (CA politicians)
« Reply #4 on: March 14, 2011, 01:22:34 PM »
Prove "need" to your sheriff just like everyone else in KA.  I consider living as need.

I have passed over job opportunities in KA because it wasn't worth it even at 2-3x the current pay.
"Why are you carrying a pistol?  Expecting trouble?"

"No Maam.  If I was expecting trouble, I'd have a rifle."

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: Guns for ME but NOT for THEE (CA politicians)
« Reply #5 on: Today at 05:52:29 AM »

kmitch200

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: Guns for ME but NOT for THEE (CA politicians)
« Reply #5 on: March 14, 2011, 02:06:09 PM »
But some legislators say their job has become dangerous too. Despite objections from some law enforcement officials and even gun rights advocates, they want a law that would make it easier for them to tote firearms for protection.

Then RESIGN you useless piece of crap!
Nobody forced or sentenced you to be a right infringing idiot.

Put up with the same stupid process you forced on everyone else in your utopian paradise.
You can say lots of bad things about pedophiles; but at least they drive slowly past schools.

TAB

  • DRTV Rangers
  • Top Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10232
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 103
Re: Guns for ME but NOT for THEE (CA politicians)
« Reply #6 on: March 14, 2011, 02:20:40 PM »
One of our long time bitchs I mean senator has had a CCW in a area that you CAN NOT get one and has for decades... she got it after then were attacked.

I always break all the clay pigeons,  some times its even with lead.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Guns for ME but NOT for THEE (CA politicians)
« Reply #7 on: March 14, 2011, 02:33:22 PM »
Boxer, Pelosi, or Feinstein ?

Ichiban

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1847
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Guns for ME but NOT for THEE (CA politicians)
« Reply #8 on: March 14, 2011, 02:50:09 PM »
You can always hope for a negligent discharge that plows through a femoral artery.

TAB

  • DRTV Rangers
  • Top Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10232
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 103
Re: Guns for ME but NOT for THEE (CA politicians)
« Reply #9 on: March 14, 2011, 03:34:50 PM »
You can always hope for a negligent discharge that plows through a femoral artery.

I'd rather it happen at a anti gun rally and hurt no one, but make a bunch of people wet/soil themselfs.
I always break all the clay pigeons,  some times its even with lead.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk