The essence of Newt

[twyacht]

Easy to refute a liberal hag like Dowd. The first paragraph is all Dem talking points,....Irrelevant.

Here's one.

FTA

Gingrich has excoriated Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae for dragging the country into a financial spiral and now demands that Freddie Mac be broken up. But it turns out that he was on contract with Freddie for six years and paid $1.6 million to $1.8 million (yacht trips and Tiffany’s bling for everyone!) to help the company strategize about how to soften up critical conservatives and stay alive.

In 2006, the Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight office reported Democratic Party operatives James Johnson and Franklin Raines earned millions – Johnson earning roughly $100 million as Fannie Mae CEO from 1991-1998 and Raines earning more than $90 million as Fannie Mae CEO from 1999-2005 – after manipulating accounting.

Google who else was paid MUCH MORE than Newt.... All the MILLIONS paid to consultants, and F&F needs another bailout?

All the while Bawney Fwank said all is well. Even GWB saw the red flags of F&F.

Newt bought jewelry for his wife with his own money!!!!! (The Horror!!!)...

The rest of the article is Rampant blather from the Head Bit** In Charge of the NY Times...(not worth lining my bird cage)...



 

[Timothy]

Now that's funny right there TW!

 

[fightingquaker13]

What koolaid? I said I'd vote for the guy. But you prove my point TW. You are saying:
 Newt took ONLY 1.6 MILLION FREAKING US DOLLARS from Freddie, while  some Democrats (who aren't running for President) took ten times that. And isn't Dowd a bitch for pointing that inconvient fact out? She's a liberal!, and how dare you quote her? By God, she commited truth on one of own, the nerve of that commie! Get a rope!  

Am I making my point here? If  the best you can do is say: "The other guy is a bigger crook" or engage in trying to smear the people who call your guy on their BS, when those people are telling truth, You (we) have a problem, because that is not a winning campaign strategy. If you don't recognize that simple fact guys, I'm not the one who needs to step away from the koolaid, because this is just reality right there. And until you realize that just getting pissed at people who say true stuff  you don't want to hear isn't a wining campaign strategy you might as well rehire Bob Dole's campaign staff and try to sell Romney/Palin 2012.
FQ13

[twyacht]

Newt wasn't entertaining a run for POTUS at the time. I not proving your "gotcha" point at all.

The Libs are scared that the voters are pissed and going to hand them a new ass this Nov. They damn sure won't get the House Back, and will Likely lose the Senate...

Another brain child Debbie Wasserman Schultz, says Marco Rubio doesn't relate to Hispanics?

Certainly part of the Lib brain trust...

[Timothy]

Admit it FQ.  You post this kind of crap in order to get this response from the forum because you love a debate and it's what you've been trained to do, correct?

Find another candidate to put your support behind that is better, from any side, than the two or three remaining contenders, please!

Give us a reason to support them instead of posting liberal hogwash from rags that haven't checked a fact in years!  

The problem is, you can't, and you find humor in these little arguments.  I'm at best a little "c" conservative because I just want the government to leave me the hell alone and stop making laws that only serve to protect no one!

I'm not the type to work for the campaign of a liberal socialist purely to make money but I recall that you considered it!  Decide what team you're on Johnny boy!

[Sponsor]

[Timothy]

I want to add this.

Regardless of whom we rally behind, our one combined effort is to get the man in the White House into the unemployment line.  

We have at least four SCOTUS Justices over 70 years of age.  Obama could possibly get a chance to put four liberal sacks-o-crazy socialists in the Supreme Court if he's reelected.  We're one heartbeat (or lack thereof) away from that happening.  This would change the face of our society for the next forty years!

We cannot let that happen under any circumstance!

Find some common ground, get behind whomever is the candidate and drag your dead uncle to the polls to get them to cast a ballot.  

It's that important!

[twyacht]

Another hypocritical point is every Republican Candidate gets a media anal probe,...The Washington Post is now soliciting for those with the dirt on Newt.

Yet, what do we know about BHO? College records? Former teachers? Former girlfriends? Former classmates? We know he voted present in Ill. ALOT. We know he associated with known domestic terrorists and racist preachers.

His brother lives in a box, and he has at least two illegal immigrant relatives that got in trouble. Other than that,....what else? A xerox copy of a copy of a birth certificate?

They had folk dumpster diving in Alaska for dirt on Palin, and bitch** like Dowd, called BHO the Messiah.

Why don't you post Chris "tingle up my leg" Matthews rant last week admitting BHO is failing. He's telling the truth too.

[Timothy]

Another hypocritical point is every Republican Candidate gets a media anal probe,...The Washington Post is now soliciting for those with the dirt on Newt.

Yet, what do we know about BHO? College records? Former teachers? Former girlfriends? Former classmates? We know he voted present in Ill. ALOT. We know he associated with known domestic terrorists and racist preachers.

His brother lives in a box, and he has at least two illegal immigrant relatives that got in trouble. Other than that,....what else? A xerox copy of a copy of a birth certificate?

They had folk dumpster diving in Alaska for dirt on Palin, and bitch** like Dowd, called BHO the Messiah.

Why don't you post Chris "tingle up my leg" Matthews rant last week admitting BHO is failing. He's telling the truth too.

Where is the "thunderous applause" icon when you need it...

 

[gunman42782]

Newt is by far the most intelligent person running.  If not for Newt, the Republican Revolution would never have happened.  I, for one, will be proud to vote for Newt!

[tombogan03884]

The NYT has been a proven communist propaganda rag since Walter Durante managed to miss the Ukrainian famine in the 20's.
The reason it's been loosing money for decades is that no one reads it for anything but sports and the crossword puzzle.
The fact that the tag "Liberal" or "mainstream media" are used in a derogatory manner a lot does not detract from the truth of the statement.
In FQ's mind the fact that the R's resist everything the dems propose does not mean they hold opposing views, it means they are "the Party of NO".
He can not grasp that all the Dems proposals are provably bad.
Another lesson in the dangers of college education versus actually thinking.
Another thing, FQ accuses us of "ad hominem" attacks, but they are not.
Ad hominem attacks need to be inaccurate or unjustified. The fact is that reading politics or gun news in the NYT is quite similar to believing the Alien stories in Weekly World News.