Get Rid of The Second Amendment - Alex Wagner MSNBC

[sledgemeister]

What was scary about this liberal retards point of view was the amount of people that cheered her for it.
What was equally as scary was the person (comedian Bill Engel) who opposed her view in the same breath said that he hunted, fished and wanted the right to self defence but that he did not see the need for people to own AK's etc? Seems a little hyprocritical to me.

See video at link:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/11/06/msnbc_and_huffington_posts_wagner_get_rid_of_second_amendment.html

MSNBC analyst and soon-to-be host of a daytime television show on the network Alex Wagner is asked what she thinks needs to be removed in the Constitution. Wagner says the second Amendment since it doesn't seem to fit in with the others.

Maher, for his part, thinks gerrymandering and corporate personhood should not be in the Constitution.

Bill Maher, HBO: "Let's ask Alex. What would you change in the Constitution?"

Alex Wagner, Huffington Post: "Well, I'm going to be pilloried for this. I think get rid of the second Amendment, the right to bear arms. I just think in the grand scheme of the rights that we have; the right of assembly, free speech, I mean, owning a gun does not, it does not tally on the same level as those other Constitutional rights. And being more discreet about who gets to have a firearm and right to kill with a firearm, I think is something that would be in our national interest to revisit that."

Seems you cant fix STUPID no matter what country you live in.

[Pathfinder]

Disappointed in Engvall, he should have known better, but then he's gone Hollywood, so he is tainted. He sounds like a Zumbo/Fudd.

[twyacht]

The folks that stand in line and actually "want" to attend Maher's show are the classic example of useful idiots....It seems on this episode, at least one, made it to the table.

Of course, Alex is going to MSNBC.

[Ulmus]

Does anyone really watch that channel?  I tried it once, but it seemed more of a TMZ version of the news.

[Timothy]

Does anyone really watch that channel?  I tried it once, but it seemed more of a TMZ version of the news.

I'm sure that the families of the news readers (I can't and won't call them journalists) are forced to watch the shows!

 

[Sponsor]

[jnevis]

Born and raised in DC does it surprise anybody? 

[Ichiban]

And being more discreet about who gets to have a firearm and right to kill with a firearm, I think is something that would be in our national interest to revisit that.

That's right, only the 'special" people should be allowed to have firearms and have the right to self defense, run the country, and tell us: how to live our lives, what to eat, what kind of light bulbs to use, what kind of cars to drive, ....

[tombogan03884]

Is Alex Wagner prepared to enforce that ?
Or does she expect some LEO to do it for her ?

[kmitch200]

Wagner: I just think in the grand scheme of the rights that we have; the right of assembly, free speech, I mean, owning a gun does not, it does not tally on the same level as those other Constitutional rights.

She's right on that part, though not in the way she meant it. The 2nd is much more important than that.

Bill Engvall is a fudd and came across as an idiot, even though he does want the right and means to defend his family. He's just bought into the libtard view that some guns are bad, but his are OK.

Rep. Issa was the only person in the group that understands what the 2nd is for: Protection from tyranny.
The Head Peterpuffer Bill Maher then goes on about how the US populace wouldn't stand a chance against the US military. Completely ignorant of the fact that any govt sucks when it is fighting a guerilla war. History and current events prove that.

As badass as the military is, a properly fought guerilla war ("hang onto their belt buckle"), can bring them to their knees. Yes, they have a LOT of hardware.
We've seen what "homemade firecrackers" like what are being used in the sandbox can do to an Abrams tank. A Humvee doesn't stand a chance.
 

[Tyler Durden]

^^^ yeah, and throw in the effect that the U.S. military would be speaking the same language and the same culture as the people, us, they would be attacking.

it probably is easier to wage war against somebody who talks funny, wears weird headgear, and throws stones at girls who were the victims of rape.

unless of course, the .gov takes a page or two out of China's playbook and transports in...oh...I don't know...a  bunch of Mexican army regulars.

the Chinese, IIRC, for the Tinneman (spelling?) Square incident brought in units from like Mongolia or something.

they either didn't speak Chinese, or it was some weird/obscure dialect.