Author Topic: NY Times Buries Fact That Admin. Doesn't Trust Military During SecDef Visit.  (Read 3216 times)

twyacht

  • "Cogito, ergo armatum sum."
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10419
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
SecDef Panetta made a visit to Afghanistan. During his landing, a crazy Afghan drove a truck into a ditch along an adjoining runway and the truck burst into flames.

A long article that rehashes the soldier that killed Afghan civilians, the politics, the tense nature of relationships, etc,.....BUT toward the bottom of the article....

snip

In a sign of the nervousness surrounding the trip, a sergeant major abruptly told the Marines gathered to hear Mr. Panetta in a tent at Camp Leatherneck to get up, place their weapons — M-16 and M-4 automatic rifles and 9-mm pistols — outside and return unarmed. The sergeant major, Brandon Hall, told reporters he was acting on orders.


“All I know is, I was told to get the weapons out,” he said. Asked why, he replied: “Somebody got itchy, that’s all I’ve got to say. Somebody got itchy; we just adjust.”


Normally, American forces in Afghanistan keep their weapons when the defense secretary visits and speaks to them. The Afghans in the tent were not armed to begin with, as is typical.


Later, American officials said that the top military official in Helmand, Maj. Gen. Mark Gurganus, had decided on Tuesday that no one would be armed while Mr. Panetta spoke, but word did not reach those in charge in the tent until shortly before Mr. Panetta was due to arrive.


General Gurganus told reporters later that he wanted a consistent policy for everyone in the tent, and that “I wanted to have the Marines look just like their Afghan partners,” noting, “you’ve got one of the most important people in the world in the room.” He insisted that his decision had nothing to do with the massacre; later, defense officials said the decision had nothing to do with the truck at the airfield.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/15/world/asia/panetta-visits-afghanistan-following-massacre.html?_r=1&hp

 My shocked face is getting a real workout this year.



Thomas Jefferson: The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government. That is why our masters in Washington are so anxious to disarm us. They are not afraid of criminals. They are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants."
Col. Jeff Cooper.

Pathfinder

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6451
  • DRTV Ranger -- NRA Life Member
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 86
This SOB General disarmed Marines - Marines!!! - so a bunch of 3rd world soldiers don't feel bad? ? ? ? ? ?

The General need to be retired immediately. And I mean before dinner tonight!!   >:(
"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do this to others and I require the same from them"

J.B. Books

robheath

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 274
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
PANETTA... That must be some forign word for pussy.
Give me liberty or I'll get my guns and get it myself.

jnevis

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1479
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Look at  it another way...
I highly doubt Panetta ordered the troops unarmed, it probably came from the State Dept.  The Gen is trying to save face with the Afghans.  We all know we don't trust THEM with weapons.  If he allows the Afghans to be armed it is a greater security risk then having our guys leave the toys outside and gives the impression to teh Afghans that they are on relatively equal footing for show.

A single unarmed Marine is still more dangerous than an Afghan regiment.
When seconds mean the difference between life and death, the police will be minutes away.

You are either SOLVING the problem, or you ARE the problem.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Look at  it another way...
I highly doubt Panetta ordered the troops unarmed, it probably came from the State Dept.  The Gen is trying to save face with the Afghans.  We all know we don't trust THEM with weapons.  If he allows the Afghans to be armed it is a greater security risk then having our guys leave the toys outside and gives the impression to teh Afghans that they are on relatively equal footing for show.

A single unarmed Marine is still more dangerous than an Afghan regiment.

That's a mistake , and an injustice, right there.
Giving those poor Afghans the mis impression that they will ever be any where near equal a US Marine.

Sponsor

  • Guest

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Makes me remember to other opinions about Marines. 

One I posted here taken from a column in a gun magazine telling the story of how a British woman who was traveling with Marines recently and was protected by them to the point that they covered her with their bodies from incoming.  She was awed by their "rude" language, not to her, but Marine Talk, and how they eagerly looked forward to confronting the enemy.  She said to one Marine "What would your mother say to you if she knew you risked your life to save mine?"  The Marine answer "What would she think of me if I didn't."

The other woman was Eleanor Roosevelt who's quote was:

“The Marines I have seen around the world have the cleanest bodies, the filthiest minds, the highest morale, and the lowest morals of any group of animals I have ever seen. Thank God for the United States Marine Corps!”


Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

twyacht

  • "Cogito, ergo armatum sum."
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10419
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
It's another capitulation, apology, and weakening of our posture. Right up there with it's for the "children".....Disarming combat troops, in a combat theater of operations, is an insult.... Not to the Afghan's but US!!! This order came from some desk jockey in D.C. not the Commanders on the ground.

"I am concerned for the security of our great Nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within."
General MacArthur

It is much easier for warriors to fare well under conditions of maximum stress than to be impeccable under normal circumstances.

Rat Bast**ds...

Thomas Jefferson: The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government. That is why our masters in Washington are so anxious to disarm us. They are not afraid of criminals. They are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants."
Col. Jeff Cooper.

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 478
If moral, along with the entire situation over there has deteriorated to the point they're worried about one of our guys popping the Secretary Of Defense, perhaps it's time to get out of that stink hole? This war makes Vietnam look successful, and Saigon fell what, 3 hours after we left? About the only thing left to add to the total stupidity of being over there, would be to start airlifting fertilizer to improve their Poppy fields. What a convoluted clusterf*#k.

jnevis

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1479
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
If moral, along with the entire situation over there has deteriorated to the point they're worried about one of our guys popping the Secretary Of Defense, perhaps it's time to get out of that stink hole? This war makes Vietnam look successful, and Saigon fell what, 3 hours after we left? About the only thing left to add to the total stupidity of being over there, would be to start airlifting fertilizer to improve their Poppy fields. What a convoluted clusterf*#k.

Who says we aren't?  It may be headed there for them to use for actual FOOD production but divert it to the poppy fields by the local elders.
When seconds mean the difference between life and death, the police will be minutes away.

You are either SOLVING the problem, or you ARE the problem.

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 478
Who says we aren't?  It may be headed there for them to use for actual FOOD production but divert it to the poppy fields by the local elders.

It wouldn't surprise me in the least.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk