FQ,
I had a couple, thankfully only a couple, professors and instructors like you. When I go to a course that has entry standards I am there to further my education - not review what I should know. If you have students that are not up to speed it is their responsibility to catch up. The majority in your class are paying over $100, and often much more, per credit to learn. Quit dumbing down education by catering to the lowest common denominator!
I have not talked to a college student that could not find tutoring help if they need it to catch up or meet the minimum entry standards. When you offer that as a part of your class you are stealing from those that came prepared.
I have learned through 30 years of adult and youth education that I have been involved with that people will achieve the standard you set. If you lower the bar that is as far as they will go. However, if you keep raising the bar, within reason, they will keep striving to reach that bar. There are always a few that will do just what they need to do to pass, but most will try for the extra, and some will try for more than you expect.
The following is a current dilemma I have with a teaching partner that I am trying to resolve, but it ties to the current mess our teacher's unions have created locally:
Teaching To The Test
Every year I am the lead instructor for our Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Firearm Safety and Hunter Education. This is the mandatory course if you wish to obtain a hunting license in Minnesota, and most of the students are 11 or 12 years of age. We do have about 30% of the class that are older teenagers and parents of youth.
I start the course with a description of what they will learn and how they will learn it. I introduce the textbook and its format. 100% of the time I will get several questions at that time and multiple times a session about what to read, how far into the book to go, and if they need to do the worksheets. My constant response is that they need to know everything in the book, and they should start reading and completing the worksheets. They should continue until they are finished! I tell them that we want to focus on the most important safety issues and the extras not in the book, but we can not do that if we need to teach the book.
Every year we have about 20% that struggle with items we don't focus on verbally, and 4% to 5% that need to retest or get special help to pass the test. My co-instructor wants me to update and reintroduce a practice test that I used one year when I was an assistant instructor a decade ago. That year we had 100% pass on the first try and an average score of 96%. I am reluctant, because I am just teaching the test and not true knowledge and skill. I am spoon feeding the student what they need to pass the test without true practical knowledge and skill.
Too many teachers today are going the easy route to raise scores and move things on in a non-confrontational manor at the expense of true teaching. Now I just need to get across to my co-instructor that in the name of feel good get them their card so they can go hunting with dad, I will not sacrifice true safety and knowledge. If I bend in this area I am feeding the fire of the anti's that idiots are running around in the woods in their Elmer Fudd hats shooting everything they see or hear.