Let me clarify what I meant about FMJ ammo and dead enemy soldiers. I was referring to pistol caliber rounds fired from a Thompson Submachinegun for example. And on the opposite side there are many dead American, British, French, and Russian soldiers due to well placed 9mm rounds from a MP 40. Sorry for not being more clear about that...
My point is FMJ may not be the most efficient ammo for killing people but it sure is a far cry from being an absolute inferior option if that's all you have.
Can you provide the sources for your statements above? I would not mind reading what these authors had to say, as I like reading up on ballistic effectiveness over history.
Thanks!
-G
OK, that answers my apples vs oranges , but it still leaves the "no data for the HP's" argument.
I will cheerfully concede that FMJ beats the crap out of using rocks and pointy sticks.
The Information on the Dum Dum bullets, IIRC came from "the Boer War" by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (yes that AC Doyle Sherlock Holmes wasn't all he wrote

)
As for the Armed Forces of signatory nations being limited to FMJ, Tim is right about the Hague convention of 1899, but there were further conventions reinforcing and updating that in the early 1920's (23 IIRC )