Author Topic: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview  (Read 22738 times)

Tyler Durden

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 992
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #60 on: January 24, 2013, 11:42:17 AM »
Has anyone seen a retraction by the Newtown Bee newspaper about the SWAT team guy being caught with a gun running away from the school?

If he was carrying a gun in him, he could just as easily be carrying a police walkie talkie and listening to the responding police radio calls.  That would be their cue that it is time to bug out.

Were any of the three guys apprehended that day ever checked for gunshot residue?

Majer

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1846
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 88
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #61 on: January 24, 2013, 11:43:43 AM »
Maybe they had the new black panther party do the deed,haven't they called for the "killin of cracker babies"... ::)  ::) ::)
"If violent crime is to be curbed, it is only the intended victim who can do it. The felon does not fear the police, and he fears neither judge nor jury. Therefore what he must be taught to fear is his victim." - Jeff Cooper
Pericles--"Freedom is only for those who have the guts to defend it".

The problem with society today is that not enough of us drink wine from our enemies skulls”.

It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze.

Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars!!!
-Sheriff Jim Wilson
"When tyranny becomes law rebellion becomes duty" Thomas Jefferson
Es gibt keine Notwendigkeit zu befürchten, Underdog hier ist.
Great nations rise and fall. The people go from bondage to spiritual truth, to great courage, from courage to liberty, from liberty to abundance, from abundance to selfishness, from selfishness to complacency, from complacency to apathy, from apathy to dependence, from dependence back again to bondage. Where are we now??????

Tyler Durden

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 992
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #62 on: January 24, 2013, 11:59:19 AM »
Google Terrence Yeakey's name then get back to me about how to get police to keep their mouths shut.

Tyler Durden

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 992
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #63 on: January 24, 2013, 12:03:04 PM »
Maybe they had the new black panther party do the deed,haven't they called for the "killin of cracker babies"... ::)  ::) ::)

It was the reptillians.  They teleported the black Honda and Adam Lanza to the scene.  They just forgot about taking the shotgun out of the trunk first.  Dang reptillians, they can't get nuthin' right! 

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #64 on: January 24, 2013, 07:46:10 PM »
Google Terrence Yeakey's name then get back to me about how to get police to keep their mouths shut.

Tyler has mentioned this guy before and I posted this link .
You have got to read this,

http://forums.officer.com/t64968/

There's over 180 hits on this.

Think back on all the FBI "terror plot" busts, agents helped with finances, agents helped with targeting, agents helped with planning, agents supplied the explosives, about all the shmuck had to do was show up .

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/fbi-terror-bomb-plot-federal-nyc-arrest-202929163--finance.html

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/sep/28/news/la-pn-congress-terror-plot-20110928

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9616696/FBI-arrests-man-in-terror-sting-timeline-of-plots-on-US-soil.html

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #65 on: Today at 04:28:01 PM »

Ksail101

  • Airborne all the way!!!
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #65 on: January 25, 2013, 08:27:13 AM »
I just wanted to share some thoughts. This being a government operation is not too hard to believe if you look at it like this. I'm goin to use more of the Aurora inconsistencies.  So in that case Holmes got a roughly 22,000 dollar grant from the government. Had his apartment rigged so ingeniously it took FBI bomb experts 2 days to figure out the triggers and rigging. You can't just read about that on the net.

Anyway it takes three top men in a black ops department of a government origination to say basically go do this. So u have to keep those three people quiet and from all the ops we run and never hear about that is possible. You don't have to really tell anyone else. The police will bungle and cover up stuff just because that is the nature of police work. Inconsistency of witness testimony will cause different stories from coming out. Now one of those three men Will need to be no the ground posing as a FBI agent or some sort of high ranking fed that can have oversight and the ear of top local police brass. He can coach the top brass on what he thinks they should answer in interviews. You can see that that happens by the questions the decide to answer and ignore and or say we can not comment at this time on that. And in both cases FBI agents are seen standing behind the local police chiefs in the interviews.

So basically you recruit a fall guy. Holmes or Lanza. You make the guns that he will be caught with the same as a family member or tie them to him some how. You wind him up set him loose with help in direction. In both cases mulitiple people have been witnessed in the the actions. A caller in the movie theater with a goatee opening the door for Holmes. And others in the forest or in black sweatshirts in the Lanza case. Both fall guys have serious issues where more than one person has witnessed and issue as of late. Not hard to find a guy like that anywhere. Shoot there are people at my work that fit that. So really the cover up is not hard. It's natural it will happen. Look they can't even give us an accurate gun count. And the thing that would shut everyone up the camera footage is nonexistent and going to be used in court so all the fed agent has to do is lock that down ship it out saying its being reviewed for evidence Edit/ Dr it and then release it later.

Not a lot of people need to be in on this for it to work. You are talking about a min of 5 or max of 10.  All now dead or buried deep in a government agency that has no real oversight. Just my thoughts. Sorry for any mistakes typing on my phone  

I wanted to add to this. In this day and age of Facebook and twitter I'm 30 and have accounts on both depicting a pretty good picture of who I am and what I like. We are talking about 2 guys younger than me and there is nothing about them out there. More of Holmes than Lanza cause Holmes "changed" when he got to Colorado. Just too meet and tidy all of it.
Did we win???

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #66 on: January 25, 2013, 09:22:06 AM »
What KSail describes is exactly what has happened in many "domestic terror" cases except the feds stop short of real explosives.

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #67 on: January 25, 2013, 09:32:51 AM »
I can imagine the thoughts of a Police Department that starts uncovering these types of inconsistencies.

"You know, with the nature of these inconsistencies, it sure looks like some agency might be involved in this incident.  I wonder how far we could investigate that before we starting dieing in single car accidents?"
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #68 on: January 25, 2013, 10:26:56 AM »
I can imagine the thoughts of a Police Department that starts uncovering these types of inconsistencies.

"You know, with the nature of these inconsistencies, it sure looks like some agency might be involved in this incident.  I wonder how far we could investigate that before we starting dieing in single car accidents?"

Or shooting ourselves in the back of the head .
I take it you read the above link .

http://forums.officer.com/t64968/

Tyler Durden

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 992
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #69 on: January 25, 2013, 05:07:08 PM »
Or shooting ourselves in the back of the head .
I take it you read the above link .

http://forums.officer.com/t64968/

after walking or crawling a mile and a half from your vehicle, which is soaked in your blood because you slashed your wrists and neck while still inside the vehicle.

 ???

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk