Author Topic: SAF Staff Helped Write Background Check Bill  (Read 16408 times)

PegLeg45

  • NRA Life, SAF, Constitutionalist
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13268
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1382
SAF Staff Helped Write Background Check Bill
« on: April 13, 2013, 05:57:36 PM »
Got this video from Georgia Gun Owners, Inc. saying Alan Gottlieb of the Second Amenment Foundation and his staff helped write the Manchin-Tommey expanded federal background check bill.

I don't know if that is good or bad........

Here is what Gottlieb has to say:



Quote
This is a quote from Gottlieb:

“Unfortunately some of my colleagues haven’t quite figured it out yet because they weren’t standing in the room writing it. My staff was. I’ll be perfectly candid about it. This will probably break on Monday in the Wall Street Journal. “

"I expect perdition, I always have. I keep this building at my back, and several guns handy, in case perdition arrives in a form that's susceptible to bullets. I expect it will come in the disease form, though. I'm susceptible to diseases, and you can't shoot a damned disease." ~ Judge Roy Bean, Streets of Laredo

For the Patriots of this country, the Constitution is second only to the Bible for most. For those who love this country, but do not share my personal beliefs, it is their Bible. To them nothing comes before the Constitution of these United States of America. For this we are all labeled potential terrorists. ~ Dean Garrison

"When it comes to the enemy, just because they ain't pullin' a trigger, doesn't mean they ain't totin' ammo for those that are."~PegLeg

1Buckshot

  • Monty Lucht
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 452
  • COMMENCE FIRING
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SAF Staff Helped Write Background Check Bill
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2013, 07:36:00 PM »
I did not read this on Toomey's  post of the Background bill. With the things Alan brought up that are in the bill makes me want to look at it more closely. Alan seems always to look at the big picture, trade a little to get a lot back. Just a thought but worth a look.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: SAF Staff Helped Write Background Check Bill
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2013, 08:38:47 PM »
Universal background checks are nothing but a backdoor to registration, and confiscation, I don't care WHO wrote the bill .

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: SAF Staff Helped Write Background Check Bill
« Reply #3 on: April 13, 2013, 08:48:39 PM »
Universal background checks are nothing but a backdoor to registration, and confiscation, I don't care WHO wrote the bill .

Not if your name/ID  never leave the local FFL where you are acquiring the firearm.
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: SAF Staff Helped Write Background Check Bill
« Reply #4 on: April 13, 2013, 09:35:34 PM »
It can't be enforced with out registration .
How can they charge you with not going through a background check unless they know who last owned the gun ?
Which means it has to have been registered.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: SAF Staff Helped Write Background Check Bill
« Reply #5 on: Today at 04:24:42 PM »

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7621
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 588
Re: SAF Staff Helped Write Background Check Bill
« Reply #5 on: April 13, 2013, 09:57:05 PM »
I haven't read the bill, but I'm will to bet dollars to donuts that the CCW exemption for a NICS is gone.

The whole thing is about control and being in a position so that if confiscation is decreed later on, the government has all the info they need.

Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW 1968-1972

JLawson

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SAF Staff Helped Write Background Check Bill
« Reply #6 on: April 13, 2013, 11:42:53 PM »
For those who have not read it yet:

Quote
Thursday, Apr 11

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senator Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) tonight posted the bill text of The Public Safety And Second Amendment Rights Protection Act that he and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) introduced yesterday.

The full text of The Public Safety And Second Amendment Rights Protection Act is available below:

http://www.toomey.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=968

kmitch200

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2290
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: SAF Staff Helped Write Background Check Bill
« Reply #7 on: April 14, 2013, 02:50:29 AM »
It can't be enforced with out registration .
How can they charge you with not going through a background check unless they know who last owned the gun ?
Which means it has to have been registered.

Nobody said it has to work as intended.

SEC. 103. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.
Nothing in this title, or any amendment made by this title, shall be construed to-
(1) expand in any way the enforcement authority or jurisdiction of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives; or
(2) allow the establishment, directly or indirectly, of a Federal firearms registry.


To quote Napoleon: "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."

I haven't read the bill, but I'm will to bet dollars to donuts that the CCW exemption for a NICS is gone.

I'm not sure...

"(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply if-
"(A) the transfer is made after a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer has first taken possession of the firearm for the purpose of complying with subsection (s), and upon taking possession of the firearm, the licensee-
"(i) complies with all requirements of this chapter as if the licensee were transferring the firearm from the licensee's business inventory to the unlicensed transferee, except that when processing a transfer under this chapter the licensee may accept in lieu of conducting a background check a valid permit issued within the previous 5 years by a State, or a political subdivision of a State, that allows the transferee to possess, acquire, or carry a firearm, if the law of the State, or political subdivision of a State, that issued the permit requires that such permit is issued only after an authorized government official has verified that the information available to such official does not indicate that possession of a firearm by the unlicensed transferee would be in violation of Federal, State, or local law;

You can say lots of bad things about pedophiles; but at least they drive slowly past schools.

fatbaldguy

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
  • Friends, don't let friends, shop Wal-Mart
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SAF Staff Helped Write Background Check Bill
« Reply #8 on: April 14, 2013, 07:15:31 AM »
May issue is the problem.  BATFE pressure on licensee's will mean all purchases/transfers will go through NICS.  Bound books are available to BATFE all the time.  No notice required.  Without having read the text of the bill, this is backdoor registration.  Contact your Senator/s.

Contact your reps in the house.  Have them shoot it down.  Make it crash and burn.  Make 'em have to sift the ashes to find any remnant of this POS legislation.

EDIT:  Upon further review, this does not appear to be a POS legislation after all.  I am wrong.  Hearing what Gottlieb had to say, plus a cursory  reading of the text of the legislation, leads me to believe that our side may be able to get over on the anti's with this one.  I especially like having this over-ride local and state legislation when conveying a firearm in a motor vehicle.
“It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood.”

James Madison

1Buckshot

  • Monty Lucht
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 452
  • COMMENCE FIRING
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SAF Staff Helped Write Background Check Bill
« Reply #9 on: April 14, 2013, 08:02:26 AM »
Amazing how the light turns on  when someone actually reads the text before making a comment on it. It's the people on the far side of arguments (Right or Left) that refuse to See and Hear before they make a statements.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk