« Reply #20 on: September 21, 2013, 06:45:42 AM »
While I tend to agree with Tom that a right not exercised is a right relinquished, this Starbuck's kerfuffle is, in my opinion, mostly a non-issue.
As I read the original pronouncement and the follow-up, more restrictive verbiage, I don't see that much has changed.
Where OC is legal. it's still legal.
Starbucks would prefer it if those with a right to OC would not extend that right to their stores.
They can't legally enforce that preference.
And, while I also agree with Tom about the quality of their coffee (I won't drink it) this latest posturing by their CEO gives me even less reason to patronize their cafes.
File this under: Who Cares?
Crusader Rabbit
What Bunny Boy says!

Logged
If I appear taller than other men it is because I am standing on the shoulders of others.