The media, our political "experts", and the entire Democrat Party wave "Originist" as a scarlet letter. If a justice is labeled an Originist, they are not fit for the task.
Why? An Originist goes to the document, consults the writings and transcripts of those who crafted the Constitution, and the context it was written in. What is wrong with this? How can you even begin to adjust for precedent or changing times if you don't study and understand the origin?
There is a Bible teacher I have listened to and read over several decades. He is continually stating "If you want to know what the Bible says, go to the Bible." Don't go to all the commentaries, evangelists, current, or even historic, books. Go to the Bible, and look at what the context of the writing was.
If you want to know what the Constitution says and why, go to the Constitution, the writings, and the transcripts of those who crafted and worked to ratify it.