Hi All! It's been a while.
As the title says, I'm having trouble deciding what kind of optic to put on my 300 BLK pistol. Right now, it's between a Primary Arms micro dot, with or without the magnifier, a Vortex arms red dot of some type, a Vortex PST 2.5-10 illuminated scope or a 1-4 illuminated scope. If I could find an inexpensive 1-6, I would consider that instead. The pistol is going to be used primarily for deer hunting or if SHTF, a "serious social purpose" rifle (with proper SBR permit, of course.)
My coworker and I have an ongoing dispute over scopes. He said on anything that could be used "tactically" (hunting is tactical, right?), you need a 1 or 1.1 to something. He also says you shouldn't need to go to anything higher than 6, but 8 would be great, like the uber-expensive Leupold. He also runs a Schmidt and Bender, I think a 1.1 - 4, which is equal or greater than the cost of his rifle.
I, on the other hand, frequently go up to 10x on my current rifle when deer hunting. We occasionally face 200-300 yard shots, but even at 150, I don't mind the increased magnification.
But 50 yard shots are much more common and a red dot is so fast. The deer I got this year was at about 20-25 yards. I would have to agree with my coworker that it did take some work to find it at the 3.5 setting. With a Red Dot and a Primary Arms 6x magnifier, I think that could get me to 150 yards comfortably. In reality, I'm only using a scope at its lowest or highest magnification, not in between.
So you see my dilemma. I'm sure I'm not the first one to face this choice, so I'd love to hear how anyone else came to reach their decision. Thanks in advance for your help.
Marzie