Author Topic: AR Lowers: Good and bad?  (Read 9242 times)

Walter45Auto

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1800
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
AR Lowers: Good and bad?
« on: September 19, 2008, 03:26:14 PM »
I'd like to save up for an AR Lower or 2 (I'd save up for 3 or 4 if I could.). I'd like to know what brands you prefer. And more importantly, what brands do I need to stay away from.
"If You seek to do me harm, I don't care about your past." - Michael Bane

ellis4538

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3455
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: AR Lowers: Good and bad?
« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2008, 05:55:08 PM »
Michael had something about them on one of his last DR Podcasts.  He mentioned DPMS @ $125 which is about the going price in my area.  Don't have anyplace to shoot an AR but am looking at a lower anyway for a future build (hopefully).  Don't know much about other brands.

Hope this helps,

Richard
Used to be "The only thing to FEAR was FEAR ITSELF", nowadays "The only thing to FEAR is GETTING CAUGHT!"

.45

  • Forum Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: AR Lowers: Good and bad?
« Reply #2 on: September 19, 2008, 06:51:54 PM »
for a stripped lower...they are all about the same.  I would go with Stag for $115 http://www.rainierarms.com/?page=shop/detail&product_id=328

For a complete lower i would go with the standard LMT for $330

DDMac

  • Proudly Bald On
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1297
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: AR Lowers: Good and bad?
« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2008, 06:53:24 PM »
FWIW guys, I just saw an ad from SRT Supply Direct, in Clearwater, near Hazcat in Florida, for a DPMS, Panther Lite 16, AR-15 complete for $690.00.
 Will you be able to build one for less at some point in the future? I'm a Bushmaster fan, but certainly not an AR expert. Have had a Colt, Olympic Arms and Bushmaster. All the same to me.      

Mac.
Standing up for your Right to lay down suppressive fire since 1948!

Big Frank

  • NRA Benefactor Member
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9552
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1073
Re: AR Lowers: Good and bad?
« Reply #4 on: September 20, 2008, 02:09:02 AM »
I love my Colt. I've probably had it over 15 years and it's been very good. My other one is a DPMS that I've barely shot. It looks good.
""It may be laid down as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every Citizen who enjoys the protection of a free Government, owes not only a proportion of his property, but even his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at a Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency." - George Washington. Letter to Alexander Hamilton, Friday, May 02, 1783

THE RIGHT TO BUY WEAPONS IS THE RIGHT TO BE FREE - A. E. van Vogt, The Weapon Shops of Isher

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: AR Lowers: Good and bad?
« Reply #5 on: Today at 11:47:34 PM »

Walter45Auto

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1800
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: AR Lowers: Good and bad?
« Reply #5 on: September 20, 2008, 09:52:06 PM »
People were buying them up at the Gun Show today. If I had the money I'd have too. And there were plenty of vendors out there ready to sell them, let me tell you. The DPMS's were going for $209 to $239 most tables. A few had them for $119, and I think I saw one or 2 for $109. Saw a no-name one for $90. Most of the Rock River Arms lowers weren't priced bad either. When I get one I may get an assembled one instead of stripped, but I don't know yet.
"If You seek to do me harm, I don't care about your past." - Michael Bane

m25operator

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2628
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: AR Lowers: Good and bad?
« Reply #6 on: September 20, 2008, 11:38:08 PM »
There are many good lower receivers, I like DPMS, but Colt, Bushy, Stag, etc... are very good also and probably made in the same facility, stay away from essential arms, or nessards, unless you are a competent gunsmith, with no money but a huge desire to build an AR.
" The Pact, to defend, if not TO AVENGE '  Tarna the Tarachian.

Big Frank

  • NRA Benefactor Member
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9552
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1073
Re: AR Lowers: Good and bad?
« Reply #7 on: September 20, 2008, 11:53:57 PM »
I heard that Stag makes some of the other brands. Supposed to be very good. Only game in town for lefties too. Saw a DMPS rifle with a good forged lower and extruded upper. Extrusions are what you get from a pasta maker or a Play-Doh fun factory. Not for me.
""It may be laid down as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every Citizen who enjoys the protection of a free Government, owes not only a proportion of his property, but even his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at a Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency." - George Washington. Letter to Alexander Hamilton, Friday, May 02, 1783

THE RIGHT TO BUY WEAPONS IS THE RIGHT TO BE FREE - A. E. van Vogt, The Weapon Shops of Isher

.45

  • Forum Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: AR Lowers: Good and bad?
« Reply #8 on: September 21, 2008, 12:47:05 AM »
CMT makes Stag and quite a few other brands.  Here is a thread that shows who makes what.  http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=12&t=318113

As with everything else you get what you pay for.  I would rather spend a little more upfront and have a lower built to a standard.  When companies cut corners by not using mil-spec receiver extensions or not staking the castle nut...it makes me wonder what other corners they cut.  For a plinker this probably doesn't matter, but for something you might have to depend on someday it does...at least for me.
my $.02

Good Luck!

Pathfinder

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6425
  • DRTV Ranger -- NRA Life Member
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 82
Re: AR Lowers: Good and bad?
« Reply #9 on: September 21, 2008, 06:32:07 AM »
Survivalblog.com http://www.survivalblog.com/ had an interesting discussion on this topic. This is Rawles' response to the idea of keeping lowers to barter after a new Rat gun ban -

"When the US Congress passed the so-called "assault weapon" ban (circa 1994-to-2004), the BATF came out with an edict that stripped receivers that had been made before the ban, but that were assembled into completed rifles after the ban would not be legal build in a pre-ban configuration. So that nixes your low-cost "hedging on potential legislation" investment idea. If you are worried about a Democrat in the White House and the advent of a new ban, then I think that investing in full capacity magazines is a far better investment. You will probably triple or quadruple your money."

TEOTWAWKI, however, is a whole different matter.
"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do this to others and I require the same from them"

J.B. Books

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk