Author Topic: Ballistics question- .380 vs 9m and .38  (Read 59645 times)

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Ballistics question- .380 vs 9m and .38
« Reply #10 on: October 31, 2008, 12:30:40 PM »
Now we're getting somewhere....380 is a 9mm short.."Kurz"... I know a guy who's family name is Kurz...does that mean they are, y'know, short?

Actually, it means that the original family member to wear that name probably WAS short , like Carpenter, Joiner, Cooper, etc.

jimbob_texas

  • Gun-totin' redneck
  • Forum Member
  • **
  • Posts: 42
  • The Mud Bowl 2008
    • Texican Tattler
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Ballistics question- .380 vs 9m and .38
« Reply #11 on: October 31, 2008, 03:46:03 PM »
Wow it's almost funny to read the last two paragraphs and wonder if they are speaking about the same round. The second paragraph ends with talking about the 380 being used for police and military use then a few sentances later it is called a good varmint round.
Glock manufactures a .380 police and military model (25/28?), but you can't own one in the US.  Doesn't meet import restrictions - go figure.  I like the Glock 26 (9mm) as my IWB carry gun.
Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7621
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 588
Re: Ballistics question- .380 vs 9m and .38
« Reply #12 on: October 31, 2008, 04:22:08 PM »
I like my PPK/s in .380 for ccw.   I've fired tactical ammo into Georgia red clay.  (Thicker than ballistic gelatin, but not as stiff as a phone book.)  Beautiful mushrooms in 6-8" penetration.
Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW 1968-1972

ericire12

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7926
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Ballistics question- .380 vs 9m and .38
« Reply #13 on: November 03, 2008, 07:45:33 AM »
9mm +P will get you 466 ft/lbs from the 115 gr Corbons
Everything I needed to learn in life I learned from Country Music.

Scott Moore

  • Forum Member
  • **
  • Posts: 41
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Ballistics question- .380 vs 9m and .38
« Reply #14 on: November 04, 2008, 12:51:37 AM »
Worldwide I think you’ll find the 9mm/.380 family one of the most popular handgun loads. Here in the US until a decade or so ago the .38spl/.357mag family was probably the most popular for defense. Of course they surpassed the .32 S&W family which was popular in the early 1900’s.
While the 9mm & .38 are very similar in diameter, the .38 is slightly larger at .357 diameter and the 9mm family are .355 in diameter. I remember reading in the gun magazines in the late 80’s and early 90’s when the big debate was raging about replacing the .45 with the 9mm in the US military that some scribes were spouting that the European’s must be weaker because they used the 9 and w used the 45 . . . man the adoption of the 9 sure caused a lot of discussion! Of course that was before the development of the great bullet designs we have now. While I have a couple of 9mm pistols and one AR in that caliber as well as several .380’s it’s not my number one caliber to carry. If I need a smaller handgun I’ll carry a S&W 640 or a Colt Detective Special. When I can carry a bigger caliber it’s a 40 or 45 in auto and a .357 in a big revolver.
Back to the .380 / 9mm question, when I was with the ME’s office in the 90’s I worked many gun shoot cases and have based many of my carry ideas based on what I witnessed. I once worked a case of a Deputy Sheriff killed in the line of duty (one of my worst days on the job). The deputy was hit three times with a .380 FMJ and two 12 ga shotgun slugs. We really didn’t believe the .380 wounds would have been fatal. Of course these days we have superior bullet designs that are made to work with specific calibers and speeds. In the case of .380 vs 9mm while they are the same diameter they operate at totally different speeds. Yesteryear they might have used FMJ bullets, but today most .380 HP’s are designed for that specific speed as opposed to the 9x19 projectile which is designed to perform at a greater speed.
I’m sure you can find reliable antidotal from fellow Downrangers to help you decide on caliber and bullet design.
J. Scott Moore
Columnist - Downrange.tv

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: Ballistics question- .380 vs 9m and .38
« Reply #15 on: Today at 02:38:22 AM »

rojawe

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1071
  • To the Republic for which it stands One Nation
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Ballistics question- .380 vs 9m and .38
« Reply #15 on: November 20, 2008, 07:39:51 PM »
EMPLOYERS STOP THE FLOOD E-VERIFY WORKS

rojawe

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1071
  • To the Republic for which it stands One Nation
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Ballistics question- .380 vs 9m and .38
« Reply #16 on: November 20, 2008, 08:05:13 PM »
http://www.handloads.com/misc/stoppingpower.asp

try this just select cal and bullet weight
EMPLOYERS STOP THE FLOOD E-VERIFY WORKS

Big Frank

  • NRA Benefactor Member
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11269
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1560
Re: Ballistics question- .380 vs 9m and .38
« Reply #17 on: November 21, 2008, 08:23:51 PM »
Wow. Some .380 ammo is better than 9mm FMJ. I didn't know that. .45 ACP is the only ball ammo that's any good IMO. If your hollow-point magic bullets fail and act like a FMJ, bigger is always better. Having twice as much weight and 1/10" larger diameter helps when things go bad.
""It may be laid down as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every Citizen who enjoys the protection of a free Government, owes not only a proportion of his property, but even his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at a Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency." - George Washington. Letter to Alexander Hamilton, Friday, May 02, 1783

THE RIGHT TO BUY WEAPONS IS THE RIGHT TO BE FREE - A. E. van Vogt, The Weapon Shops of Isher

DesertMarine

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 406
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Ballistics question- .380 vs 9m and .38
« Reply #18 on: November 22, 2008, 05:28:28 AM »
Looked at the figures handload.com for the three calibers.  I compared the 38 w/125 gr Federal Nycads, 9mm 124 gr w/Federal HydraSkok/Nycad and 380 90 gr w/Corbon JHP and Federal HydraShok .  38 had 63 One Shot Stops (OSS) w/2" barrel.  9mm had 83% out of 1198 shootings w/69 of those shootings with =<4" barrels.  380 had 55-71% OSS, no mention of barrel length.  With those parameters, I don't think you can draw good conclusions due to unequal barrel lengths. 

DesertMarine

Fatman

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1454
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Ballistics question- .380 vs 9m and .38
« Reply #19 on: November 24, 2008, 08:02:35 PM »
Wow. Some .380 ammo is better than 9mm FMJ. I didn't know that. .45 ACP is the only ball ammo that's any good IMO. If your hollow-point magic bullets fail and act like a FMJ, bigger is always better. Having twice as much weight and 1/10" larger diameter helps when things go bad.

Plus if things really go south and you have a .45 you can crawl up the barrel and hide.
Anti: I think some of you gentleman would choose to apply a gun shaped remedy to any problem or potential problem that presented itself? Your reverance (sic) for firearms is maintained with an almost religious zeal. The mind boggles! it really does...

Me: Naw, we just apply a gun-shaped remedy to those extreme life threatening situations that call for it. All the less urgent problems we're willing to discuss.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk