Author Topic: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA  (Read 23284 times)

garand4life

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 797
    • My Blog
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #60 on: February 25, 2009, 03:34:28 PM »
I agree that officers have a responsibility to follow orders from the President without question, but, I also believe that your oath as a member of the armed services to "UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION" take precedence above all other orders.
NRA Certified Pistol Instructor
"If you know your enemy is bringing a gun to the fight, bring 2..."
http://www.youtube.com/natetinstman  -
Save $10 on your NRA membership by going to http://garand4life.wordpress.com

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #61 on: February 25, 2009, 03:38:42 PM »
I agree that officers have a responsibility to follow orders from the President without question, but, I also believe that your oath as a member of the armed services to "UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION" take precedence above all other orders.


All those Nazi's hung or imprisoned at Nuremberg claimed they were following orders to, but that was not an acceptable defense.

1776 Rebel

  • Guest
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #62 on: February 25, 2009, 03:49:54 PM »
Just for reference...

The oath an officer in the US Military takes:

"I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God." (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)

http://www.history.army.mil/faq/oaths.htm

The Presidential Oath is directly from the US Constitution:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A2Sec1

The interesting note that hits me is that an officer  is asked about "purpose of evasion" while the President is not. Wouldn't it be a hoot if BHO beat the rap on a technicality...

tt11758

  • Noolis bastardis carborundum (Don't let the bastards wear you down)
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5821
  • DRTV Ranger ~
    • 10-Ring Firearms Training
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #63 on: February 25, 2009, 04:31:06 PM »
We're overlooking two of the most frightening words in the english language in this discussion.  Suppose he WAS born in Kenya, then those two terrifying words become reality.

The two words to which I refer?  "President Biden".


But wait.......what if BOTH Obama AND Biden were removed?  President Pelosi.

Geez, I just threw up in my mouth a little as I wrote that.
I love waking up every morning knowing that Donald Trump is President!!

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #64 on: February 25, 2009, 08:48:28 PM »
We're overlooking two of the most frightening words in the english language in this discussion.  Suppose he WAS born in Kenya, then those two terrifying words become reality.

The two words to which I refer?  "President Biden".


But wait.......what if BOTH Obama AND Biden were removed?  President Pelosi.

Geez, I just threw up in my mouth a little as I wrote that.

Relax, if the "anointed one" is removed it will be because the whole crew of them went up against a wall somewhere.
The replacements will not come from the normal line of succession.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #65 on: Today at 11:33:39 AM »

cookie62

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 893
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #65 on: February 25, 2009, 10:39:04 PM »
Relax, if the "anointed one" is removed it will be because the whole crew of them went up against a wall somewhere.
The replacements will not come from the normal line of succession.


It won't be me, I can't work for his adminastration...........
I PAID my taxes ;)
A bird in the hand is worth..Well, about a box of shells!
Yes, I'm bitter and cling to guns and religion..

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7701
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 615
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #66 on: February 26, 2009, 05:30:47 AM »

It won't be me, I can't work for his adminastration...........
I PAID my taxes ;)

Yeah that and we own guns.
Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW 1968-1972

Teresa Heilevang

  • The "Other Halloway"
  • Global Moderator
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3639
  • Don't make me call the flying monkeys! DRTV Ranger
    • The Perfect Touch
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #67 on: February 27, 2009, 01:12:29 AM »
Alan Keyes has some things to say about Obama too.

Obama Will Destroy U.S.

Arch-conservative Alan Keyes is not giving Barack Obama any honeymoon.

After the Los Angeles Times "Top of the Ticket" column picked up Keyes' comments - taken from an impromptu interview posted to YouTube - about Obama from last week, those comments have been the buzz of the web this past weekend.

Keyes, a former U.S. ambassador, ran against Obama in 2004 as the Republican Senate candidate in Illinois.

In his diatribe against the new president, Keyes calls Obama a "radical communist" and says "he will destroy this country" and warns that unless he is stopped, America "will cease to exist."

 

Keyes also says Obama has failed constitutional muster to become president, since, Keyes argues, Obama was born in Kenya.

Obama has stated he was born in Hawaii. His campaign has released his Certificate of Live Birth - not his actual birth certificate. Hawaii state officials said they reviewed the actual birth certificate and that Obama was born in the state of Hawaii.

Also, Obama's family placed a legal advertisement in a Hawaii newspaper days after he was born.


View here
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/keyes_obama_destroy_US/2009/02/23/184503.html?s=al&promo_code=7ACC-1
"Well Behaved Women Rarely Make History ! "
 

runstowin

  • Thomas Jefferson: “Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just”
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 886
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #68 on: February 27, 2009, 09:56:56 AM »
Alan Keyes is very articulate, that is why is is ignored by the MSM.
Rights are like muscles, when they are not exercised they atrophy.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #69 on: February 27, 2009, 09:59:29 AM »
Alan Keyes is very articulate, that is why is is ignored by the MSM.


That's why WE have to spread the word via any means (internet ) available.
This thread has been viewed nearly 2,000 times, if every one who viewed it sent that U Tube link to 10 others.......

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk